On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 22:21:39 +0100 Tom Hughes <tom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 17/10/2019 21:39, Steve Grubb wrote: > > On Thursday, October 17, 2019 4:21:44 PM EDT Tom Hughes wrote: > >> On 17/10/2019 20:44, Steve Grubb wrote: > >>> I don't think __x86_64__ is defined as the program is aimed at > >>> eBPF in the > >>> kernel. In rawhide, we no longer have glibc-devel(x86-32) to > >>> allow this to > >>> resolve. However, I think that the assumption of not having > >>> __x86_64__ defined means we are targeting i686 is wrong. What > >>> should I do? Do we not support eBPF programs on Fedora? > >> > >> I can still see glibc-devel.i686 in rawhide which provides that. > > > > In rawhide I got [1]: > > > > No matching package to install: 'glibc-devel(x86-32)' > > > > But on my local system, F30, it works fine. > > I just tried it with mock on F30: > > mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --install 'glibc-devel(x86-32)' > > and that worked fine. > > >> As far as I know the 32 bit multilib packages aren't going away. > > > > Hmm. I still wonder if the headers might need reworking to not > > assume 32 bit if the target is bpf. > > I don't know enough about how the BPF backend works to be > able to comment on that. I guess the problem will be building in koji, it isn't multi-lib capable. Dan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
