On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:05 AM John M. Harris Jr <johnmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tuesday, October 15, 2019 6:26:31 PM MST Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > given that we're talking about the need to migrate defaults > > To clarify, that has not been decided, and a prominent option mentioned in > this thread is the option to simply require that there is a non-modular > package. > I think we can pretty much guarantee that's not going to happen. Unfortunately, modularization is a one-way road, given how modularity is implemented in DNF and how our distribution policies are currently structured. It just means that people need to *really* think of the consequences of modularizing content, because there's basically no going back after that. We have no escape hatches or transition mechanisms to go from modular to non-modular variants of the same RPMs. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
