Re: Fedora Modularity: What's the Problem?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 15:21, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:16 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thank you for this very useful summary.
> >
> > One general problem with the thinking behind this is that it applies much more
> > to CentOS or RHEL than it does to Fedora. In particular:
> > > users want a solid, stable, reliable, *unchanging* system.
> >
> > In that case, really, Fedora is not the answer. No matter how much I love
> > Fedora, I know that it is never going to be most stable and reliable, and
> > it is never going to be *unchanging*.
> >
>
> There's a lot to unpack in your reply here, but ultimately most of it

There was a lot of unpack in the first email... a lot of it seemed to
be things which you can have 1 or the other but we are trying to have
both. So I don't think this is 'begging the question' as much as
fundamental 'wat?'

> seems to fall from this fundamental point. It's a logical fallacy
> called "begging the question". The current state of Fedora is...
> volatile. It's new, it's exciting and occasionally dangerous. But your
> presumption here is that the danger should not be avoided. You're
> saying "Fedora isn't stable therefore Fedora shouldn't be made more
> stable" and effectively asserting that no one *else* would want it to
> be more stable as well.
>
> Yes, RHEL and CentOS have a particular business model that rides on
> "nothing changes". Modularity offers us the chance to take some of our
> more radical changes and phase them in, rather than push every user
> onto them at an upgrade boundary. The assertion that users of Fedora
> wouldn't be welcoming to "my apps are more stable but I still get the
> latest kernel/platform stuff" is, in my opinion, incorrect.

I think the issue is that neither of you are defining what expected
lifespans of stability or what stability is. After that you can
disagree whether it is important or not to what you want to do... but
until then you are both talking past each other.



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux