Re: Fedora Modularity: What's the Problem?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2019-10-28 at 15:33 -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
> Gentoo's solution to "too fast, too slow" addresses every requirement
> in this post, except for this one:
> 
> On Mon, 2019-10-28 at 10:08 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Requirement: Packagers must be able to encode whether their output
> > artifacts are intended for use by other projects or if they are
> > effectively private to the alternative version. Packagers must also
> > have a way of finding this information out so they understand what
> > they can and cannot rely on as a dependency.

Oh, and to be fair, I'll also add that Gentoo does not achieve the
"good UX" goal. But I don't think that changes the equation; I think
it'd be less effort to modify our tooling to emulate what Gentoo did
than it would be to continue on this path.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux