On Mon, 2019-11-04 at 03:18 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > *Requirement*: Users must be able to discover what alternative > > software > > versions are available with tools that are shipped with the OS by > > default. > > Ideally, these should be the same tools that they are already > > comfortable > > with. > > This is a requirement that I also consider more rigid than really > necessary. > Is it really unreasonable to require locating a Copr to get a non- > default > version of something? The default version is the default for a > reason, so > IMHO it should be fine if that is the only version shown out of the > box, by > default. There is a "dnf copr search" subcommand.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
