Re: Modularity and all the things

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2019-10-25 at 09:43 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> That is true, but the wording used also implied that this design has
> not been
> considered.

The question of whether other designs have been considered has been
raised many times over the years, and I've not seen it claimed that
yes, these specific designs were considered and were rejected. I also
don't see it documented at 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/modularity that these suggested
ideas were considered. If people keep asking if these designs were
considered and don't get answers, it does become reasonable to think
that maybe they weren't.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux