On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 6:52 AM Tomasz Torcz <tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 11:10:48AM +0100, Chris Murphy wrote: > > I filed this awhile ago, but didn't pursue getting it disabled on the > > Fedora side in the meantime. While I'm a fan of zstd, I think in hindsight > > I'd have recommended postponing rolling out that change until a retrace > > server solution was in place. I'd definitely say this should have been a > > listed liability of the change to use zstd. > > This is a fallout of us not “dogfooding”, but running our infrastructure > on some other distributions. > I agree. While RHEL is part of the Fedora family, we can't really do much for it. At least we'll eventually get zstd support in RHEL 8. I suppose we could rebuild rpm with zstd support for the server before then, since it's just a bcond away... -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
