On Thursday, October 17, 2019 4:28:27 PM MST Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Of course if you just don't modularize FreeIPA at all you don't have > > the kickstart problem, but then you *do* still have the 'we're stuck > > shipping this one version of FreeIPA for the next seventy jillion > > years' problem. > > > That is purely a RHEL thing though. I do not see how this is relevant to the > discussion on whether to allow default streams *in Fedora*. Even then, as a RHEL subscriber, I'd question its usefulness there. I use RHEL at work because I want a solid stable system without many changes in a release cycle. It makes is much easier with large deployments and high numbers of administrators/users, who may be resistant to change. Throwing a random new version of a package on there sounds like a nightmare. Actually, I'm not even sure how I'd deploy modules in the environment that I support, because it doesn't have internet access. I usually just download the RHEL repo DVD and I'm good to go. -- John M. Harris, Jr. Splentity _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
