Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday, October 17, 2019 4:28:27 PM MST Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> 
> > Of course if you just don't modularize FreeIPA at all you don't have
> > the kickstart problem, but then you *do* still have the 'we're stuck
> > shipping this one version of FreeIPA for the next seventy jillion
> > years' problem.
> 
> 
> That is purely a RHEL thing though. I do not see how this is relevant to the
>  discussion on whether to allow default streams *in Fedora*.

Even then, as a RHEL subscriber, I'd question its usefulness there. I use RHEL 
at work because I want a solid stable system without many changes in a release 
cycle. It makes is much easier with large deployments and high numbers of 
administrators/users, who may be resistant to change. Throwing a random new 
version of a package on there sounds like a nightmare.

Actually, I'm not even sure how I'd deploy modules in the environment that I 
support, because it doesn't have internet access. I usually just download the 
RHEL repo DVD and I'm good to go.

-- 
John M. Harris, Jr.
Splentity

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux