Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> I'm planning to make Maven modules parallel-installable with ursine
> packages - maven-3.6 module would not have any conflicts with any
> ursine packages. The required packaging work is already done,
> parallel-installable PoC of Maven 3.6 is available from MBI repos [1].
> Currently I'm waiting for one MBS/Koji [2] issue to be resolved before
> building the module in Fedora infrastructure. The issue is already
> fixed in staging Koji and I hope that production will be fixed soon
> too.
>
> Once parallel-installability is implemented, existence of Maven
> modules will not affect building any packages. Ursine Java packages
> will be built with ursine Maven, while modular Java packages will be
> built with javapackages-tools module, maintained by me.
That sounds good. Now the only question that you have not answered (and
sorry if the answer is obvious) is: What are the advantages of the version
packaged as a module? Or in other words: Under which use cases would one
want to use that version rather than the XMvn version packaged in the ursine
packages and in the javapackages-tools module?
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
