On 04/11/19 10:40 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > IMHO, this should be our number one priority over modules, new > spins, or whatever paint color the bike shed needs to be today. > I would like to see DNS over TLS (DoT) with DTLS at the very least. I may be wrong, but it seems to me the usual plaintext by default system wide policies regarding name resolution is what drives some famous applications to bypass system altogether, perhaps overboard from other perspectives (e.g. in steep contrast with crypto limits unification, whereby not abiding the system policies is deemed bad practice): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751410 -- Jan (Poki)
Attachment:
pgp8qiARfQcOP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
