Josh Boyer wrote:
> What you call unfair, I call open source winning in the industry.
> Does it create an imbalance between funded vs. unfunded work? Yes.
> That is the reality of the software landscape today though, and I
> think it's a net good thing even if it is somewhat departed from what
> people consider open source "roots".
Some of us do not believe in capitalism, especially in the dogma that the
markets will always do the right thing.
What I see in this case is that the design of Modularity is optimized for
large enterprise customers (of RH/IBM) with deep pockets and their use
cases. Those have the resources to bring up a separate container, VM, or
even a separate physical server for every single server application they
run. They also do not seem to consider the desktop use case to be critical.
(I can only guess that they use Windows on all their desktops, or they would
care.) Everyone else gets stuck in version conflict hell.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
