On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 20:56:13 -0600 Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Once upon a time, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx> said: > > Without robust integration with AD, I have no use > > for FreeIPA. And I don't know *anyone* who uses a FreeIPA server. > > > > Perhaps it's time to drop FreeIPA? > > Nope. You are assuming the everybody needs AD... lots of people have no > use for AD and just want a good IdM. > > Never assume your use case is the only use case. If I can speak for myself and for the Linux people I know, nobody needs a FreeIPA, and many need a Samba AD DC. And of course they want a stable solution if possible. The current situation leads to either choosing a different distribution (the simplest solution), or compiling a Samba with Heimdal Kerberos themselves; perhaps someone chooses a commercial solution also (which is of course with Heimdal Kerberos). I am not saying that the FreeIPA is useless or has no users, but in my opinion the chosen attitude to the Samba AD DC was perhaps the worst possible and IMO at least frustrated a lot of users (including me). For me, thanks to Nico Kadel-Garcia, for his work to make stable as possible Samba AD DC in Fedora/Centos. Regards, Franta Hanzlik -- I hope the Fedora will have a better init and no binary logs _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
