Re: EPEL-8 builds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 12:29, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 04:48:41PM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 4:36 PM Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Dne 07. 11. 19 v 11:12 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> > > > I'd like to know why people are pushing EPEL-8 builds without engaging
> > > > with the maintainers of the packages.
> > >
> > > Because they can?
> > > Nothing in guidelines say: "you have to contact maintainer of different branch when you request new one".
> >
> > If there's specific reasons that a maintainer wouldn't want it in el8
> > surely the right thing to do would be to engage so they could at least
> > offer to co-maintain it for el8. I feel it's wrong to assume that
> > someone is able to take on the load of maintaining the package for the
> > lifetime of el8 without engagement. If the person doesn't have the
> > time or interest it just ends up with something that will bitrot and
> > give everyone a bad experience.
> >
> > I feel the guidelines should include those requirements or something
> > similar else it's just hostile to expect that someone takes up that
> > extra load whether they want to or not!.
>
> Yeah, the epel guidelines do, but I don't think there's any enforcement.
> :(
>
> Long back in the pkgdb days the way it worked is that you request a
> branch and if you are maintainer/comaintainer you can just have it, if
> you are not you had to wait at least a week for the maintainers to
> ack/nack the request. Sadly, I don't think there was any notification of
> these, so people would just request and wait a week and get the branch.
>
> Perhaps we can add a check to the new branch request thing that
> hopefully will land soon. Pingou? I'd even be ok with just requiring you
> be a maintainer to request the branch.
>
> It's completely not right to sign someone else up for a bunch of work
> without their consent.
>
>

I agree 100% on that. If it turns out that it was something I did, I
need to be made comaintainer on those packages and deal with it.


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux