Once upon a time, Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> said: > If we build things statically with libraries, it's a can full of worms. > What needs to be said about this change that we don't staticaly link > against different libraries, we just build CPython source into one > "fat" executable instead of splitting it into a tiny wrapper and a > "fat" libpython. It might be useful to see how other interpreters that are built like this perform; I know perl has used libperl.so for ages (maybe all the perl5 time?). Does it have the same performance impact, and if so, can/should it be switched to /usr/bin/perl linking the core static? Alternately, is there some way to reduce the overhead of the dynamic library (that could help multiple languages)? -- Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
