Re: Encrypted DNS in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Marius Schwarz:

> Am 05.11.19 um 14:21 schrieb Florian Weimer:
>>
>>> ahm.. in which way, does the use of encryption, make a sourcelist for
>>> dns names to ask, obsolete?
>> Names or servers?
> "names of domainnameservers"
>
>>> nscd i.e. uses resolv.conf as source for the round robin server list.
>> With encryption, the server address will always be 127.0.0.1 (or
>> potentially in the future, a UNIX domain socket) because pretty much all
>> the current DNS client software does not support encryption.  Running a
>> small local cache has other benefits as well, such as caching server
>> reachability information.

> running a local DNS-Cache does not make so much sense as you may
> think.

It definitely makes sense to cache server availability because that's
not something a short-running process can effectively determine from
scratch.

I categorically reject your notion that you can increase privacy by
sending queries to more servers.  As a result, you will end up with a
larger set of servers you must trust, not a smaller one.

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux