Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christopher Engelhard wrote:
> Personally, I like a solution along the lines of what e.g. Kevin Kofler
> suggested earlier, that is
> 
> 1) every package has a default version
> 2) any default version can only depend on default versions
> 3) the package manager distinguishes between 'install default, which
> happens to be version X' and 'install version X, which happens to be
> default', with automatic upgrade of 'X -> X' and 'default -> default'
> being OK and 'X -> default' or 'default -> X' requiring user intervention
> 4) where (2) cannot be achieved, we use compat packages as before
> 
> though I freely admit that I absolutely cannot judge how difficult that
> is to actually implement.

The easiest way to implement this is actually to simply make the default 
versions non-modular again and ship only alternate versions as modules 
(i.e., Miro's proposal).

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux