Am 07.11.19 um 13:01 schrieb Petr Viktorin: > If this took you by surprise, don't panic. It's possible to change the > default. Let us know and we'll work things out. Somehow I feel like I don't understand the report – or we are approaching an (almost) unmitigated disaster here: There are so many "high profile" packages which are slated for removal that we might wipe out half of our Python packaging eco system. However I hope that I might misinterpret the report: > pviktori > python-six > python2-six (→ PY2) The spec file says: > # python2 is enabled by default, Fedora 32+ exception is anticipated > %bcond_without python2 However when I check the fesco tracker I don't find any issue to request the exception: https://pagure.io/fesco/issues?status=all&search_pattern=six There are many, many more packages like python-mako and python-sqlalchemy and it would be *very* painful if they went away (as we'd have to remove *a lot* of dependent packages). I could probably fix a few packages myself but right now I don't have any "extra powers" besides being a regular maintainer. Requesting the necessary permissions would take quite a while as I am trying to get in touch with some maintainers basically for months (without success). The problem seems to be that even packages maintained by the Python SIG still require python2 (without fesco exception). To be clear: This is a about packages with active upstream, which support Python 3 and just happen to have a Python 2 subpackage in Fedora rawhide. What can I do to cut down the number of Python 2 subpackages? Felix _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
