Fedora Packaging

• Thread Index

• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Packaging Tree-sitter parsers
  • From: Peter Oliver via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Forming a lightweight SIG around MkDocs
  • From: Michel Lind via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: F42 libtimezone unannounced removal
  • From: Michel Lind via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Conditional expansion of source name
  • From: Neal Gompa via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Conditional expansion of source name
  • From: Mattia Verga via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: IMA Key Verification
  • From: Kenneth Goldman via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Guidelines changes workflow
  • From: Remi Collet via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Guidelines changes workflow
  • From: Fabio Valentini via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Guidelines changes workflow
  • From: Remi Collet via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: IMA Key Verification
  • From: Panu Matilainen via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: IMA Key Verification
  • From: Kevin Fenzi via packaging
• [no subject]
  • From: Unknown
• [Fedora-packaging] IMA Key Verification
  • From: Isaiah Inuwa via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: laurel (take 2)
  • From: Oden Eriksson via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Packaging a systemd unit in EPEL
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Packaging a systemd unit in EPEL
  • From: Ben Beasley via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: [EPEL-devel] Packaging a systemd unit in EPEL
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Packaging a systemd unit in EPEL
  • From: Brian Stinson via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] laurel (take 2)
  • From: Oden Eriksson via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Packaging Tree-sitter parsers
  • From: Peter Oliver via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Packaging Tree-sitter parsers
  • From: Fabio Valentini via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Packaging Tree-sitter parsers
  • From: Peter Oliver via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: A tool to convert Python packages to pyproject RPM macros
  • From: Miro Hrončok via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: A tool to convert Python packages to pyproject RPM macros
  • From: Michal Ambroz via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Conflicts on package split
  • From: Michael Schwendt via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Conflicts on package split
  • From: Sérgio Basto via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Conflicts on package split
  • From: Michael Schwendt via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] A tool to convert Python packages to pyproject RPM macros
  • From: Miro Hrončok via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Conflicts on package split
  • From: Sérgio Basto via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Conflicts on package split
  • From: Michael Schwendt via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Conflicts on package split
  • From: Sérgio Basto via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Conflicts on package split
  • From: Michael Schwendt via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Conflicts on package split
  • From: Neal Gompa via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Conflicts on package split
  • From: Michael Schwendt via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Conflicts on package split
  • From: Sérgio Basto via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Conflicts on package split
  • From: Michael Schwendt via packaging
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Interesting case about conflicts - update that bumps library soname and provides new compat package for old soname
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Interesting case about conflicts - update that bumps library soname and provides new compat package for old soname
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: How to proceed if a PR remains open for a long time?
  • From: Dan Čermák
• [Fedora-packaging] How to proceed if a PR remains open for a long time?
  • From: Ali Gholami
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Who to Require (google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts if langpacks-fonts-whatnot)
  • From: Akira TAGOH
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Who to Require (google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts if langpacks-fonts-whatnot)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Who to Require (google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts if langpacks-fonts-whatnot)
  • From: Akira TAGOH
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Who to Require (google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts if langpacks-fonts-whatnot)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• [Fedora-packaging] Who to Require (google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts if langpacks-fonts-whatnot)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Mismatch between versions reported in packages.fedoraproject.org and bodhi updates status for python-valkey
  • From: Matteo Centenaro
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Mismatch between versions reported in packages.fedoraproject.org and bodhi updates status for python-valkey
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Mismatch between versions reported in packages.fedoraproject.org and bodhi updates status for python-valkey
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Mismatch between versions reported in packages.fedoraproject.org and bodhi updates status for python-valkey
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• [Fedora-packaging] Mismatch between versions reported in packages.fedoraproject.org and bodhi updates status for python-valkey
  • From: Matteo Centenaro
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Summary should not end with dot?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Summary should not end with dot?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Summary should not end with dot?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• [Fedora-packaging] Summary should not end with dot?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: RFC: Virtual Provides for commands in PATH
  • From: Neal Gompa
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: RFC: Virtual Provides for commands in PATH
  • From: Carl George
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: Question about binary firmware/SDK
  • From: Dan Horák
• [Fedora-packaging] Question about binary firmware/SDK
  • From: Mattia Verga
• [Fedora-packaging] Re: laurel
  • From: Oden Eriksson
• Re: laurel
  • From: Ryan Bach
• Re: laurel
  • From: Dominic Hopf
• Re: laurel
  • From: Ryan Bach
• Re: Tmp files created between %install and %check in a python package in rawhide
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• laurel
  • From: Oden Eriksson
• Re: Tmp files created between %install and %check in a python package in rawhide
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Tmp files created between %install and %check in a python package in rawhide
  • From: Sergio Pascual
• Re: The VCS RPM tag in Fedora packages
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: The VCS RPM tag in Fedora packages
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: The VCS RPM tag in Fedora packages
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• The VCS RPM tag in Fedora packages
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: rpmlint errors/warnings while reviewing a package
  • From: Petr Pisar
• rpmlint errors/warnings while reviewing a package
  • From: Mattia Verga
• Re: RFC: Virtual Provides for commands in PATH
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: RFC: Virtual Provides for commands in PATH
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• RFC: Virtual Provides for commands in PATH
  • From: Yaakov Selkowitz
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] license of the binary policy
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] license of the binary policy
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] license of the binary policy
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] license of the binary policy
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Help with packager tools installation/configuration
  • From: Roberto C. Sánchez
• Re: Help with packager tools installation/configuration
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Help with packager tools installation/configuration
  • From: Roberto C. Sánchez
• Re: Guiding co-dependent RPM packages to swap nicely
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Guiding co-dependent RPM packages to swap nicely
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Guiding co-dependent RPM packages to swap nicely
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Guiding co-dependent RPM packages to swap nicely
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Guiding co-dependent RPM packages to swap nicely
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Pre-Generated Binaries for Perforance from Upstream
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Import of key(s) didn't help, wrong key(s)?
  • From: bradbell
• Pre-Generated Binaries for Perforance from Upstream
  • From: Tim Flink
• Re: Handling Upstream that has Diverging Licenses in Source Files but not LICENSE file
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Import of key(s) didn't help, wrong key(s)?
  • From: Michael J Gruber
• Re: Handling Upstream that has Diverging Licenses in Source Files but not LICENSE file
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Handling Upstream that has Diverging Licenses in Source Files but not LICENSE file
  • From: Tim Flink
• Re: Import of key(s) didn't help, wrong key(s)?
  • From: bradbell
• Re: Handling Upstream that has Diverging Licenses in Source Files but not LICENSE file
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Re: Handling Upstream that has Diverging Licenses in Source Files but not LICENSE file
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Handling Upstream that has Diverging Licenses in Source Files but not LICENSE file
  • From: Omair Majid
• Handling Upstream that has Diverging Licenses in Source Files but not LICENSE file
  • From: Tim Flink
• Re: Issues with mock and dnf on rawhide/F40
  • From: José Abílio Matos
• Re: Issues with mock and dnf on rawhide/F40
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Issues with mock and dnf on rawhide/F40
  • From: José Abílio Matos
• Re: Import of key(s) didn't help, wrong key(s)?
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Import of key(s) didn't help, wrong key(s)?
  • From: Brad Bell
• Re: python package with binary
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• python package with binary
  • From: Fabrice
• Re: %forgesetup failing to unpack *multiple* spec SOURCEs -- usage, or bug?
  • From: pgnd
• %forgesetup failing to unpack *multiple* spec SOURCEs -- usage, or bug?
  • From: pgnd
• Re: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot ... see root.log ...
  • From: bradbell
• Re: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot ... see root.log ...
  • From: Jonathan Wakely
• Re: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot ... see root.log ...
  • From: Mamoru TASAKA
• Re: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot ... see root.log ...
  • From: Mamoru TASAKA
• BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot ... see root.log ...
  • From: Brad Bell
• Re: Host: buildvm-x86-16.iad2.fedoraproject.org
  • From: Brad Bell
• Re: Host: buildvm-x86-16.iad2.fedoraproject.org
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: Host: buildvm-x86-16.iad2.fedoraproject.org
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Host: buildvm-x86-16.iad2.fedoraproject.org
  • From: Brad Bell
• Re: Expressing iptables/nftables dependency
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Expressing iptables/nftables dependency
  • From: Reto Gantenbein
• Re: Expressing iptables/nftables dependency
  • From: Sandro
• Expressing iptables/nftables dependency
  • From: Reto Gantenbein
• Re: Rust crates with optional namespacing and how to map them to package names
  • From: Petr Viktorin
• Do we have a packaging policy for setuid now (was: Re: Documentation for F15's "Remove SETUID" Change?)
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Rust crates with optional namespacing and how to map them to package names
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Rust crates with optional namespacing and how to map them to package names
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• [Fedora-packaging] Kde plasma doesn’t start after dnf update
  • From: Francesco Alfano
• Re: Library sonames
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Library sonames
  • From: Benson Muite
• Re: Guidance needed regarding running `ant` in %prep
  • From: Sandro
• Re: Guidance needed regarding running `ant` in %prep
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Guidance needed regarding running `ant` in %prep
  • From: Sandro
• Re: Guidance needed regarding running `ant` in %prep
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: Guidance needed regarding running `ant` in %prep
  • From: Benson Muite
• Re: Guidance needed regarding running `ant` in %prep
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Re: Guidance needed regarding running `ant` in %prep
  • From: Sandro
• Re: Guidance needed regarding running `ant` in %prep
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Guidance needed regarding running `ant` in %prep
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Guidance needed regarding running `ant` in %prep
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Re: Guidance needed regarding running `ant` in %prep
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Guidance needed regarding running `ant` in %prep
  • From: Sandro
• Re: Call for Participation: PackagingCon, October 26-28, Berlin & Virtual
  • From: Dave Clements
• Call for Participation: PackagingCon, October 26-28, Berlin & Virtual
  • From: Dave Clements
• Restore access to torrent-file-editor package
  • From: Ivan Romanov
• Re: Bundling
  • From: Otto Liljalaakso
• Re: Packaging and installing complex projects
  • From: Nicholas Frizzell
• Re: Packaging and installing complex projects
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Packaging and installing complex projects
  • From: Nicholas Frizzell
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2023-06-15 16:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: load-spellchecking and no-manual-page-for-binary
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: triggerin and multiple versions
  • From: Fabrice Creuzot
• Re: load-spellchecking and no-manual-page-for-binary
  • From: Fabrice Creuzot
• Re: load-spellchecking and no-manual-page-for-binary
  • From: Brad Bell
• Re: load-spellchecking and no-manual-page-for-binary
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: load-spellchecking and no-manual-page-for-binary
  • From: Jason Tibbitts
• Re: load-spellchecking and no-manual-page-for-binary
  • From: Fabrice Creuzot
• Re: load-spellchecking and no-manual-page-for-binary
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: load-spellchecking and no-manual-page-for-binary
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: load-spellchecking and no-manual-page-for-binary
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: load-spellchecking and no-manual-page-for-binary
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: load-spellchecking and no-manual-page-for-binary
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: triggerin and multiple versions
  • From: Todd Zullinger
• Re: load-spellchecking and no-manual-page-for-binary
  • From: Fabrice Creuzot
• Re: load-spellchecking and no-manual-page-for-binary
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• load-spellchecking and no-manual-page-for-binary
  • From: Fabrice Creuzot
• triggerin and multiple versions
  • From: Fabrice Creuzot
• Re: Bundling
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Re: Bundling
  • From: Ralf Corsépius
• Bundling
  • From: Benson Muite
• Re: Problem with GNU Hello tutorial (makeinfo not found)
  • From: Betty Liu
• Re: Problem with GNU Hello tutorial (makeinfo not found)
  • From: Betty Liu
• Re: Problem with GNU Hello tutorial (makeinfo not found)
  • From: Betty Liu
• Re: RPM 4.19: Dynamic subpackages with Python extras
  • From: Igor Raits
• Re: Problem with GNU Hello tutorial (makeinfo not found)
  • From: Otto Liljalaakso
• Re: Problem with GNU Hello tutorial (makeinfo not found)
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: Problem with GNU Hello tutorial (makeinfo not found)
  • From: Otto Liljalaakso
• Re: Problem with GNU Hello tutorial (makeinfo not found)
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Problem with GNU Hello tutorial (makeinfo not found)
  • From: Betty Liu
• Re: RPM 4.19: Dynamic subpackages with Python extras
  • From: Karolina Surma
• Re: RPM 4.19: Dynamic subpackages with Python extras
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: RPM 4.19: Dynamic subpackages with Python extras
  • From: Igor Raits
• Re: RPM 4.19: Dynamic subpackages with Python extras
  • From: Charalampos Stratakis
• Re: New %{ld_ldflags} macro?
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: New %{ld_ldflags} macro?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: New %{ld_ldflags} macro?
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: New %{ld_ldflags} macro?
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: New %{ld_ldflags} macro?
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: New %{ld_ldflags} macro?
  • From: Benson Muite
• Re: New %{ld_ldflags} macro?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: New %{ld_ldflags} macro?
  • From: Jan Drögehoff
• Re: New %{ld_ldflags} macro?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: New %{ld_ldflags} macro?
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: New %{ld_ldflags} macro?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• New %{ld_ldflags} macro?
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: Bugzilla component for reporting comps.xml issues
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Bugzilla component for reporting comps.xml issues
  • From: Jan Stodola
• Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2023-04-06 16:00 UTC)
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2023-04-06 16:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: RPM 4.19: Dynamic subpackages with Python extras
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: RPM 4.19: Dynamic subpackages with Python extras
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: RPM 4.19: Dynamic subpackages with Python extras
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• RPM 4.19: Dynamic subpackages with Python extras
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: RPM 4.18.1 released!
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Automatic virtual provides for RPM macros?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Packaging python3-*-devel subpackages
  • From: Nico Kadel-Garcia
• Re: Packaging python3-*-devel subpackages
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Packaging python3-*-devel subpackages
  • From: Ralf Corsépius
• Re: Packaging python3-*-devel subpackages
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Packaging python3-*-devel subpackages
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Packaging python3-*-devel subpackages
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Trying to set up a clean upgrade path for celestia
  • From: Mattia Verga
• Re: Trying to set up a clean upgrade path for celestia
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Any change we can get a github action that triggers downstream packaging on release?
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Any change we can get a github action that triggers downstream packaging on release?
  • From: Sorin Sbarnea
• Re: Trying to set up a clean upgrade path for celestia
  • From: Mattia Verga
• Re: Trying to set up a clean upgrade path for celestia
  • From: Mamoru TASAKA
• Re: Trying to set up a clean upgrade path for celestia
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Trying to set up a clean upgrade path for celestia
  • From: Mattia Verga
• Re: Where are the old package versions?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Are there any statistics on what proportion of Fedora packages are using rpmautospec macros?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Are there any statistics on what proportion of Fedora packages are using rpmautospec macros?
  • From: Jason Tibbitts
• Re: Are there any statistics on what proportion of Fedora packages are using rpmautospec macros?
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Are there any statistics on what proportion of Fedora packages are using rpmautospec macros?
  • From: Anne Mulhern
• Re: Where are the old package versions?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Where are the old package versions?
  • From: Travis Sidelinger
• Re: Where are the old package versions?
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: Where are the old package versions?
  • From: Travis Sidelinger
• Re: Where are the old package versions?
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Re: Where are the old package versions?
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Where are the old package versions?
  • From: Travis Sidelinger
• Re: Packages without full source code: BackupPC-XS,
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Packages without full source code: BackupPC-XS,
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Changes in the Fedora Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Packages without full source code: BackupPC-XS,
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Packages without full source code: BackupPC-XS,
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Changes in the Fedora Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Should macro packages co-own /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d, require rpm or do nothing?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Should macro packages co-own /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d, require rpm or do nothing?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Should macro packages co-own /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d, require rpm or do nothing?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Should macro packages co-own /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d, require rpm or do nothing?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Should macro packages co-own /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d, require rpm or do nothing?
  • From: Björn Persson
• Should macro packages co-own /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d, require rpm or do nothing?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2023-01-12 17:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: /etc/hosts setting in RPM spec file?
  • From: Jun Aruga (he / him)
• Re: Python packaging guidelines example spec file
  • From: Brad Bell
• Re: Python packaging guidelines example spec file
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Python packaging guidelines example spec file
  • From: bradbell
• Re: Python packaging guidelines example spec file
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Python packaging guidelines example spec file
  • From: Brad Bell
• Re: /etc/hosts setting in RPM spec file?
  • From: Frank R Dana Jr.
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2023-01-05 17:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: /etc/hosts setting in RPM spec file?
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: /etc/hosts setting in RPM spec file?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: /etc/hosts setting in RPM spec file?
  • From: Nico Kadel-Garcia
• Re: /etc/hosts setting in RPM spec file?
  • From: Jeremy McMillan
• /etc/hosts setting in RPM spec file?
  • From: Jun Aruga (he / him)
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2022-11-17 17:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: Janus: doxygen web dependencies
  • From: Renich Bon Ćirić
• Re: Janus: doxygen web dependencies
  • From: Petr Menšík
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2022-11-03 16:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: Janus: doxygen web dependencies
  • From: Renich Bon Ćirić
• Re: Janus: doxygen web dependencies
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Janus: doxygen web dependencies
  • From: Renich Bon Ćirić
• Re: Intersection of 2 arches macros
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: Intersection of 2 arches macros
  • From: Björn Persson
• Intersection of 2 arches macros
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2022-09-22 16:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• EPEL selinux policy
  • From: Mukundan Ragavan
• Re: Need help: Building a package requiring python >= 3.7 on epel8
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: [EPEL-devel] Fwd: Need help: Building a package requiring python >= 3.7 on epel8
  • From: Steve Cossette
• Re: [EPEL-devel] Fwd: Need help: Building a package requiring python >= 3.7 on epel8
  • From: Maxwell G
• Fwd: Need help: Building a package requiring python >= 3.7 on epel8
  • From: Maxwell G
• Need help: Building a package requiring python >= 3.7 on epel8
  • From: Steve Cossette
• Re: RPM-level auto release and changelog bumping - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal
  • From: Ram 256
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2022-08-11 16:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Important changes to software license information in Fedora packages (SPDX and more!)
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: inclusion of kernel module sources in a package
  • From: Ali Erdinc Koroglu
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2022-07-28 16:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Fedora adoption of SPDX ids and changes to packaging guidelines
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Re: Re: other licensing guidance
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Re: Re: other licensing guidance
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Re: Re: other licensing guidance
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Re: Re: other licensing guidance
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Re: Re: other licensing guidance
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Re: Re: other licensing guidance
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Re: Re: other licensing guidance
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: other licensing guidance
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: other licensing guidance
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: other licensing guidance
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: other licensing guidance
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: other licensing guidance
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: other licensing guidance
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] other licensing guidance
  • From: Maxwell G
• other licensing guidance
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Fedora adoption of SPDX ids and changes to packaging guidelines
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Fedora adoption of SPDX ids and changes to packaging guidelines
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2022-07-21 16:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: What way of opting out form a particular Python shebang flag do you prefer?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• QEMU info
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2022-07-14 16:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: inclusion of kernel module sources in a package
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: inclusion of kernel module sources in a package
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: inclusion of kernel module sources in a package
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: inclusion of kernel module sources in a package
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: inclusion of kernel module sources in a package
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: inclusion of kernel module sources in a package
  • From: Zamir Sun
• Re: inclusion of kernel module sources in a package
  • From: Zamir Sun
• Re: inclusion of kernel module sources in a package
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: inclusion of kernel module sources in a package
  • From: Zamir Sun
• inclusion of kernel module sources in a package
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Replacing pytest -n auto with pytest -n %{_smp_build_ncpus}
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: What way of opting out form a particular Python shebang flag do you prefer?
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: What way of opting out form a particular Python shebang flag do you prefer?
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: What way of opting out form a particular Python shebang flag do you prefer?
  • From: Simon de Vlieger
• What way of opting out form a particular Python shebang flag do you prefer?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Shell Completions
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Shell Completions
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Shell Completions
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: Shell Completions
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: Shell Completions
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Shell Completions
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Shell Completions
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: Shell Completions
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Shell Completions
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: Shell Completions
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Shell Completions
  • From: Maxwell G
• Re: [RFC] Build tag in RPM: from NVR to NVRB
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: [RFC] Build tag in RPM: from NVR to NVRB
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: [RFC] Build tag in RPM: from NVR to NVRB
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: [RFC] Build tag in RPM: from NVR to NVRB
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: [RFC] Build tag in RPM: from NVR to NVRB
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: [RFC] Build tag in RPM: from NVR to NVRB
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: [RFC] Build tag in RPM: from NVR to NVRB
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: [RFC] Build tag in RPM: from NVR to NVRB
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: [RFC] Build tag in RPM: from NVR to NVRB
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Arthur Bols
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Arthur Bols
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Arthur Bols
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Otto Urpelainen
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Jason Tibbitts
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2022-05-26 16:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] license of the binary policy
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Otto Urpelainen
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: license of the binary policy
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] license of the binary policy
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] license of the binary policy
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: [Fedora-legal-list] license of the binary policy
  • From: Neal Gompa
• license of the binary policy
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2022-04-07 16:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: rpmbuild: `! true` does not fail %install, but `false` does, `! true` fails other sections
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Re: rpmbuild: `! true` does not fail %install, but `false` does, `! true` fails other sections
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: rpmbuild: `! true` does not fail %install, but `false` does, `! true` fails other sections
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: rpmbuild: `! true` does not fail %install, but `false` does, `! true` fails other sections
  • From: Mamoru TASAKA
• rpmbuild: `! true` does not fail %install, but `false` does, `! true` fails other sections
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2022-03-24 17:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: Requesting an epel9 branch
  • From: Scott Talbert
• Re: Requesting an epel9 branch
  • From: Brad Bell
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2022-03-10 17:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: Create new override not possible
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Create new override not possible
  • From: Martin Gansser
• Re: Documentation for F15's "Remove SETUID" Change?
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2022-03-03 17:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: Requesting an epel8 branch
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Documentation for F15's "Remove SETUID" Change?
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: Requesting an epel8 branch
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Requesting an epel8 branch
  • From: Brad Bell
• Re: Problem Compiling yabridge 3.8.0: error: invalid conversion from 'uint32_t*' {aka 'unsigned int*'} to 'LPDWORD' {aka 'long unsigned int*'
  • From: Martin Gansser
• Re: Problem Compiling yabridge 3.8.0: error: invalid conversion from 'uint32_t*' {aka 'unsigned int*'} to 'LPDWORD' {aka 'long unsigned int*'
  • From: Mamoru TASAKA
• Problem Compiling yabridge 3.8.0: error: invalid conversion from 'uint32_t*' {aka 'unsigned int*'} to 'LPDWORD' {aka 'long unsigned int*'
  • From: Martin Gansser
• Re: EPEL8 build problem
  • From: Steve Cossette
• EPEL8 build problem
  • From: Steve Cossette
• Re: Packaging for EPEL9 question
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Packaging for EPEL9 question
  • From: Steve Cossette
• Re: Preventing .build-id file conflicts between pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 and pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: Preventing .build-id file conflicts between pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 and pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2022-02-17 17:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: Preventing .build-id file conflicts between pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 and pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: Preventing .build-id file conflicts between pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 and pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Preventing .build-id file conflicts between pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 and pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Preventing .build-id file conflicts between pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 and pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: Preventing .build-id file conflicts between pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 and pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Preventing .build-id file conflicts between pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 and pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Preventing .build-id file conflicts between pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 and pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: GPG key error during mockbuild
  • From: Mikel Olasagasti
• GPG key error during mockbuild
  • From: Brad Bell
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2022-02-10 17:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: font copies in sphinx generated documentation
  • From: Petr Menšík
• Re: font copies in sphinx generated documentation
  • From: Petr Menšík
• Re: font copies in sphinx generated documentation
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: font copies in sphinx generated documentation
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: font copies in sphinx generated documentation
  • From: Petr Menšík
• Re: Restricting a build to one arch
  • From: Brad Bell
• Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2022-02-03 17:00 UTC)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2022-02-03 17:00 UTC)
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2022-02-03 17:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: Restricting a build to one arch
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Restricting a build to one arch
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Re: Restricting a build to one arch
  • From: Dan Horák
• Restricting a build to one arch
  • From: Brad Bell
• Re: Announcing LLVM Snapshot Packages for Fedora Linux
  • From: Konrad Kleine
• Re: Incorrect link in message from notifications@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Incorrect link in message from notifications@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Brad Bell
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2022-01-27 17:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: [python] tox config file not found
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Re: [python] tox config file not found
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• [python] tox config file not found
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2022-01-20 17:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: Guidelines: Should numbered patches be replaced by unnumbered in most of our examples?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Guidelines: Should numbered patches be replaced by unnumbered in most of our examples?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Guidelines: Should numbered patches be replaced by unnumbered in most of our examples?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Guidelines: Should numbered patches be replaced by unnumbered in most of our examples?
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Guidelines: Should numbered patches be replaced by unnumbered in most of our examples?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Guidelines: Should numbered patches be replaced by unnumbered in most of our examples?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2022-01-13 17:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: SO versioning in the spec file
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: SO versioning in the spec file
  • From: Mamoru TASAKA
• Re: SO versioning in the spec file
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: SO versioning in the spec file
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: SO versioning in the spec file
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: SO versioning in the spec file
  • From: Scott Talbert
• Re: SO versioning in the spec file
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• SO versioning in the spec file
  • From: Ian McInerney
• Re: Thoughts on pyproject-rpm-macros and license files?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Thoughts on pyproject-rpm-macros and license files?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Thoughts on pyproject-rpm-macros and license files?
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: Thoughts on pyproject-rpm-macros and license files?
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: Thoughts on pyproject-rpm-macros and license files?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Thoughts on pyproject-rpm-macros and license files?
  • From: Richard Fontana
• Re: Thoughts on pyproject-rpm-macros and license files?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Revisiting header-only packages and noarch
  • From: Björn 'besser82' Esser
• Re: Thoughts on pyproject-rpm-macros and license files?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Thoughts on pyproject-rpm-macros and license files?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Thoughts on pyproject-rpm-macros and license files?
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2021-12-16 17:00 - 17:30 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: Revisiting header-only packages and noarch
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2021-12-09-17 17:00 - 17:55 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: Revisiting header-only packages and noarch
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Revisiting header-only packages and noarch
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Re: Revisiting header-only packages and noarch
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Revisiting header-only packages and noarch
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Re: Revisiting header-only packages and noarch
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Revisiting header-only packages and noarch
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2021-12-09 17:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: how I test RPM Conditionals in shell command line
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: how I test RPM Conditionals in shell command line
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• how I test %if %else %endif conditions in shell command line
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: Thanksgiving sneak preview of something cool....
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: Thanksgiving sneak preview of something cool....
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Thanksgiving sneak preview of something cool....
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: Thanksgiving sneak preview of something cool....
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Thanksgiving sneak preview of something cool....
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Thanksgiving sneak preview of something cool....
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: How do I get the source package _name_ from an installed RPM?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: How do I get the source package _name_ from an RPM?
  • From: Nico Kadel-Garcia
• Re: How do I get the source package _name_ from an RPM?
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: How do I get the source package _name_ from an installed RPM?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: How do I get the source package _name_ from an RPM?
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: How do I get the source package _name_ from an RPM?
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: How do I get the source package _name_ from an RPM?
  • From: Thomas Moschny
• Re: How do I get the source package _name_ from an RPM?
  • From: Tomas Hrnciar
• Re: How do I get the source package _name_ from an RPM?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: How do I get the source package _name_ from an RPM?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: How do I get the source package _name_ from an RPM?
  • From: Nico Kadel-Garcia
• Re: How do I get the source package _name_ from an RPM?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: How do I get the source package _name_ from an installed RPM?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• How do I get the source package _name_ from an RPM?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Should we have rpm package policies tying extension packages to the GNOME versions they'll work with?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Should we have rpm package policies tying extension packages to the GNOME versions they'll work with?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Should we have rpm package policies tying extension packages to the GNOME versions they'll work with?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Should we have rpm package policies tying extension packages to the GNOME versions they'll work with?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Should we have rpm package policies tying extension packages to the GNOME versions they'll work with?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Should we have rpm package policies tying extension packages to the GNOME versions they'll work with?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Should we have rpm package policies tying extension packages to the GNOME versions they'll work with?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Should we have rpm package policies tying extension packages to the GNOME versions they'll work with?
  • From: Gwyn Ciesla
• Re: Should we have rpm package policies tying extension packages to the GNOME versions they'll work with?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Should we have rpm package policies tying extension packages to the GNOME versions they'll work with?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2021-11-11 17:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Fwd: Converting montserrat spec to new version
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2021-10-14 16:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Announcing LLVM Snapshot Packages for Fedora Linux
  • From: Konrad Kleine
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2021-10-07 16:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: RPM-level auto release and changelog bumping - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal
  • From: madara uchiha
• Re: Mangling shebangs in text files: How to detect them, bug in the current implementation and possible solutions
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: contacting package owners
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: contacting package owners
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: contacting package owners
  • From: cheese
• Re: contacting package owners
  • From: Neal Gompa
• contacting package owners
  • From: cheese
• Re: Sphinx/Doxygen HTML documentation and bundling guidelines
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Re: Mangling shebangs in text files: How to detect them, bug in the current implementation and possible solutions
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Sphinx/Doxygen HTML documentation and bundling guidelines
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Sphinx/Doxygen HTML documentation and bundling guidelines
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Sphinx/Doxygen HTML documentation and bundling guidelines
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Sphinx/Doxygen HTML documentation and bundling guidelines
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Re: Sphinx/Doxygen HTML documentation and bundling guidelines
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Re: Mangling shebangs in text files: How to detect them, bug in the current implementation and possible solutions
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Sphinx/Doxygen HTML documentation and bundling guidelines
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Sphinx/Doxygen HTML documentation and bundling guidelines
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Re: Mangling shebangs in text files: How to detect them, bug in the current implementation and possible solutions
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Mangling shebangs in text files: How to detect them, bug in the current implementation and possible solutions
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Mangling shebangs in text files: How to detect them, bug in the current implementation and possible solutions
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Mangling shebangs in text files: How to detect them, bug in the current implementation and possible solutions
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Mangling shebangs in text files: How to detect them, bug in the current implementation and possible solutions
  • From: Thomas Moschny
• Re: Mangling shebangs in text files: How to detect them, bug in the current implementation and possible solutions
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Mangling shebangs in text files: How to detect them, bug in the current implementation and possible solutions
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Mangling shebangs in text files: How to detect them, bug in the current implementation and possible solutions
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Mangling shebangs in text files: How to detect them, bug in the current implementation and possible solutions
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Mangling shebangs in text files: How to detect them, bug in the current implementation and possible solutions
  • From: Ben Beasley
• Mangling shebangs in text files: How to detect them, bug in the current implementation and possible solutions
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Self Introduction: Jilayne Lovejoy
  • From: Gwyn Ciesla
• Self Introduction: Jilayne Lovejoy
  • From: Jilayne Lovejoy
• Re: Self Introduction: Eric Curtin
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Self Introduction: Eric Curtin
  • From: Eric Curtin
• Re: Self Introduction: Eric Curtin
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Self Introduction: Eric Curtin
  • From: Eric Curtin
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2021-09-16 16:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: Multi-version and review exception
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Multi-version and review exception
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: Multi-version and review exception
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Multi-version and review exception
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: Wine MinGW system libraries
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Wine MinGW system libraries
  • From: Zebediah Figura
• Re: Wine MinGW system libraries
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Wine MinGW system libraries
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Wine MinGW system libraries
  • From: Zebediah Figura
• Re: Wine MinGW system libraries
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Wine MinGW system libraries
  • From: Zebediah Figura
• Re: Wine MinGW system libraries
  • From: Zebediah Figura (she/her)
• Re: Wine MinGW system libraries
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Wine MinGW system libraries
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Wine MinGW system libraries
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Wine MinGW system libraries
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Wine MinGW system libraries
  • From: Zebediah Figura (she/her)
• Re: Wine MinGW system libraries
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Wine MinGW system libraries
  • From: Zebediah Figura (she/her)
• Re: Wine MinGW system libraries
  • From: Zebediah Figura (she/her)
• Re: Wine MinGW system libraries
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Wine MinGW system libraries
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Wine MinGW system libraries
  • From: Zebediah Figura (she/her)
• Re: Wine MinGW system libraries
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Wine MinGW system libraries
  • From: Zebediah Figura
• Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2021-09-02 16:00 UTC)
  • From: Otto Urpelainen
• Re: Wiki Package:SourceURL needs the OldGuidelinePage tag
  • From: Otto Urpelainen
• Wiki Package:SourceURL needs the OldGuidelinePage tag
  • From: Otto Urpelainen
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2021-09-02 16:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2021-08-26 16:00 UTC)
  • From: Otto Urpelainen
• Re: Packaging Guidelines for Desktop Applications
  • From: Johan Vromans
• Re: Packaging Guidelines for Desktop Applications
  • From: Iago Rubio
• Re: Packaging Guidelines for Desktop Applications
  • From: Johan Vromans
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2021-08-26 16:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: Packaging Guidelines for Desktop Applications
  • From: Iago Rubio
• Re: Packaging Guidelines for Desktop Applications
  • From: Johan Vromans
• Re: Packaging Guidelines for Desktop Applications
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Packaging Guidelines for Desktop Applications
  • From: Johan Vromans
• Re: Automatic virtual provides for RPM macros?
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Automatic virtual provides for RPM macros?
  • From: Steve Traylen
• Re: Automatic virtual provides for RPM macros?
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Automatic virtual provides for RPM macros?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Macro to smoke-test-import a Python module in %check
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: Trying to rebuild grub2-2.06-2.fc34 from source rpm, but one subpackage is not built.
  • From: Mamoru TASAKA
• Trying to rebuild grub2-2.06-2.fc34 from source rpm, but one subpackage is not built.
  • From: Michele Riva
• Trying to rebuild grub2-2.06-2.fc34 from source rpm, but one subpackage is not built.
  • From: michele . riva
• Trying to rebuild grub2-2.06-2.fc34 from source rpm, but one subpackage is not built.
  • From: michele . riva
• Bring your Python package to Nest and we'll help you convert it to the new Python macros
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2021-07-22 16:00 - 16:20 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2021-07-22 16:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2019-08-15 16:00 UTC)
  • From: Laluna Lawlence
• Re: Odd problem with obsoletes in EPEL8
  • From: Laluna Lawlence
• Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2021-07-15 16:00 - 16:20 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: Macro to smoke-test-import a Python module in %check
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Macro to smoke-test-import a Python module in %check
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Macro to smoke-test-import a Python module in %check
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Directory ownership of %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor
  • From: High Adventure
• Re: Macro to smoke-test-import a Python module in %check
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Licensing question
  • From: Ian McInerney
• Re: Licensing question
  • From: François Cami
• Licensing question
  • From: Nicolas FORMICHELLA
• Re: Macro to smoke-test-import a Python module in %check
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Macro to smoke-test-import a Python module in %check
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: Macro to smoke-test-import a Python module in %check
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Macro to smoke-test-import a Python module in %check
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Macro to smoke-test-import a Python module in %check
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: RPM-level auto release and changelog bumping - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal
  • From: Zulul Bulbul
• Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2021-06-17 16:00 - 17:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2021-06-17 16:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: RPM-level auto release and changelog bumping - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal
  • From: Big Fet
• Fedora survey and badge at end
  • From: Brad Bell
• Re: Old approved package review requests
  • From: Mattia Verga
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2021-06-03 16:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: Old approved package review requests
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Old approved package review requests
  • From: Mattia Verga
• Re: Who owns "Policy for encouraging comaintainers of packages"?
  • From: Jason Tibbitts
• Re: Who owns "Policy for encouraging comaintainers of packages"?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Cancel this weeks meeting due to freenode problems
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Who owns "Policy for encouraging comaintainers of packages"?
  • From: Otto Urpelainen
• Re: Does whiteboard field for package reviews still exist?
  • From: Otto Urpelainen
• Re: Cancel this weeks meeting due to freenode problems
  • From: Gwyn Ciesla
• Re: Cancel this weeks meeting due to freenode problems
  • From: James Antill
• Re: Does whiteboard field for package reviews still exist?
  • From: Brendan Early
• Does whiteboard field for package reviews still exist?
  • From: Otto Urpelainen
• Cancel this weeks meeting due to freenode problems
  • From: James Antill
• Re: Rust application package naming
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Rust application package naming
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Rust application package naming
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Rust application package naming
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Rust application package naming
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Licensing guidelines for AppStream project_license
  • From: Otto Urpelainen
• Application telemetry data
  • From: Ian McInerney
• Re: Packaging Clang plugins (need rpm-macros-clang / rpm-macros-llvm packages?)
  • From: Eugene Syromiatnikov
• Re: Packaging Clang plugins (need rpm-macros-clang / rpm-macros-llvm packages?)
  • From: FeRD
• Re: Packaging Clang plugins (need rpm-macros-clang / rpm-macros-llvm packages?)
  • From: FeRD
• Re: Packaging Clang plugins (need rpm-macros-clang / rpm-macros-llvm packages?)
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: Packaging Clang plugins (need rpm-macros-clang / rpm-macros-llvm packages?)
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: Packaging Clang plugins (need rpm-macros-clang / rpm-macros-llvm packages?)
  • From: Eugene Syromiatnikov
• Re: Packaging Clang plugins (need rpm-macros-clang / rpm-macros-llvm packages?)
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Packaging Clang plugins (need rpm-macros-clang / rpm-macros-llvm packages?)
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Packaging Clang plugins (need rpm-macros-clang / rpm-macros-llvm packages?)
  • From: FeRD
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2021-04-22 16:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: Golang package naming for packages from sourcehut
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Golang package naming for packages from sourcehut
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Are this Unicode Consortium files permissible content?
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Are this Unicode Consortium files permissible content?
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Golang package naming for packages from sourcehut
  • From: Gergely Polonkai
• Re: Directory ownership of %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor
  • From: High Adventure
• Re: How to automatically handle Python namespace packages (e.g. in %pyproject_save_files)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: How to automatically handle Python namespace packages (e.g. in %pyproject_save_files)
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• How to automatically handle Python namespace packages (e.g. in %pyproject_save_files)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2021-04-08 16:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: Directory ownership of %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor
  • From: Otto Urpelainen
• Re: Directory ownership of %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Directory ownership of %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor
  • From: Otto Urpelainen
• Re: Directory ownership of %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Directory ownership of %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Directory ownership of %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor
  • From: Otto Urpelainen
• Re: Directory ownership of %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Directory ownership of %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor
  • From: Otto Urpelainen
• Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2021-03-25 16:00 - 17:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill