On Mon, 2022-02-14 at 11:28 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Mon, 2022-02-14 at 10:34 +0100, Michal Schorm wrote: > > The time had to come, when two packages would generate the same > > hash. > > > > I was hit by: > > --- > > Error: Transaction test error: > > file /usr/lib/.build-id/34/feaa549462e8818baa0629ce11da344465882b > > conflicts between attempted installs of discord-0.0.16- > > 1.fc35.x86_64 > > and skypeforlinux-8.79.0.95-1.x86_64 > > --- > > some time ago but since neither is a package maintained by Fedora > > Project maintainers, no one gave a damn about the core of the > > issue. > > That time, I got one of the apps as a Flatpak instead, but not all > > packages have such workarounds at hand. > > yeah , thank you for reminder these cases (with electron apps) > > we fixed with `%global debug_package %{nil}` is fixed with %global _build_id_links none > > -- > > > > Michal Schorm > > Software Engineer > > Core Services - Databases Team > > Red Hat > > > > -- > > > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 2:13 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hey, > > > apparently some ELF files are identical between Fedora's pypy3.7- > > > libs and > > > pypy3.8-libs packages. > > > > > > On Fedora 34, this leads to installation conflict: > > > > > > Error: Transaction test error: > > > file /usr/lib/.build- > > > id/39/208b4f57aa4d5cfcbed13cf6c5ec428de27264 from > > > install of pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 conflicts with file > > > from package > > > pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 > > > file /usr/lib/.build- > > > id/40/682aae1fc61eaa03230eac9033407ce96488c9 from > > > install of pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 conflicts with file > > > from package > > > pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 > > > file /usr/lib/.build- > > > id/53/96df0ea06a9dd7e8eeea66aaa65dda9b64e73c from > > > install of pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 conflicts with file > > > from package > > > pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 > > > file /usr/lib/.build- > > > id/87/535f93c815a75349f4d56210c31d4ef4b797f2 from > > > install of pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 conflicts with file > > > from package > > > pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 > > > file /usr/lib/.build- > > > id/c6/bff4486941a2fb3490a80eb7b7bfe3370e8ba0 from > > > install of pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 conflicts with file > > > from package > > > pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 > > > file /usr/lib/.build- > > > id/c9/e94d839699198b0e87c334f8e03160fec054de from > > > install of pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 conflicts with file > > > from package > > > pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 > > > file /usr/lib/.build- > > > id/e4/a09cf0647ed5d0e730dcdfef7aff9f9a2e11a0 from > > > install of pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 conflicts with file > > > from package > > > pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 > > > file /usr/lib/.build- > > > id/e8/1db0d87e7cce4f5fcad18063f7b7fce2eb9590 from > > > install of pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 conflicts with file > > > from package > > > pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 > > > file /usr/lib/.build- > > > id/ee/d5ab1faa168044b871001c4117fc8b7853b3c6 from > > > install of pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 conflicts with file > > > from package > > > pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 > > > > > > As reported in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2053880 > > > > > > I've read all the previous discussion about this on Fedora devel > > > list, but I > > > still have no idea what should I do to prevent this conflict. > > > > > > Moving the files to a common component seems like a bad idea > > > given > > > it's not > > > "two packages bundle the same thing" but rather "two packages > > > built > > > in a > > > different way". > > > > > > I see this: > > > > > > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/rpm-4.16.1.3/macros.in#L177 > > > > > > %{?_unique_build_ids:--build-id-seed "%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}"} > > > > > > I suppose I could pass in %{NAME} as well, right? > > > > > > What are the side effects for changing the seed like this?: > > > > > > %global __debug_install_post \ > > > > > > %{lua:print(rpm.expand('%__debug_install_post'):gsub('%-%-build%- > > > id%-seed%s+"', > > > rpm.expand('--build-id-seed "%{NAME}-')))} > > > > > > > > > Actually, should RPM pass %{NAME} by default? Or at least have a > > > macro I could > > > redefine in a less cryptic and fragile way? > > > > > > -- > > > Miro Hrončok > > > -- > > > Phone: +420777974800 > > > IRC: mhroncok > > > _______________________________________________ > > > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > To unsubscribe send an email to > > > devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > > List Guidelines: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > > List Archives: > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > -- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure