On Sun, 2022-02-13 at 14:11 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hey, > apparently some ELF files are identical between Fedora's pypy3.7-libs > and > pypy3.8-libs packages. > > On Fedora 34, this leads to installation conflict: > > Error: Transaction test error: > file /usr/lib/.build-id/39/208b4f57aa4d5cfcbed13cf6c5ec428de27264 > from > install of pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 conflicts with file from > package > pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 > file /usr/lib/.build-id/40/682aae1fc61eaa03230eac9033407ce96488c9 > from > install of pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 conflicts with file from > package > pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 > file /usr/lib/.build-id/53/96df0ea06a9dd7e8eeea66aaa65dda9b64e73c > from > install of pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 conflicts with file from > package > pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 > file /usr/lib/.build-id/87/535f93c815a75349f4d56210c31d4ef4b797f2 > from > install of pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 conflicts with file from > package > pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 > file /usr/lib/.build-id/c6/bff4486941a2fb3490a80eb7b7bfe3370e8ba0 > from > install of pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 conflicts with file from > package > pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 > file /usr/lib/.build-id/c9/e94d839699198b0e87c334f8e03160fec054de > from > install of pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 conflicts with file from > package > pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 > file /usr/lib/.build-id/e4/a09cf0647ed5d0e730dcdfef7aff9f9a2e11a0 > from > install of pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 conflicts with file from > package > pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 > file /usr/lib/.build-id/e8/1db0d87e7cce4f5fcad18063f7b7fce2eb9590 > from > install of pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 conflicts with file from > package > pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 > file /usr/lib/.build-id/ee/d5ab1faa168044b871001c4117fc8b7853b3c6 > from > install of pypy3.7-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 conflicts with file from > package > pypy3.8-libs-7.3.7-1.fc34.x86_64 > > As reported in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2053880 > > I've read all the previous discussion about this on Fedora devel > list, but I > still have no idea what should I do to prevent this conflict. > > Moving the files to a common component seems like a bad idea given > it's not > "two packages bundle the same thing" but rather "two packages built > in a > different way". > > I see this: > > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/rpm-4.16.1.3/macros.in#L177 > > %{?_unique_build_ids:--build-id-seed "%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}"} > > I suppose I could pass in %{NAME} as well, right? yes , I like your solution , as talked in previous messages we have a long historical of .build-id file conflicts , which we should prevent > What are the side effects for changing the seed like this?: > > %global __debug_install_post \ > > %{lua:print(rpm.expand('%__debug_install_post'):gsub('%-%-build%-id%- > seed%s+"', > rpm.expand('--build-id-seed "%{NAME}-')))} > > > Actually, should RPM pass %{NAME} by default? Or at least have a > macro I could > redefine in a less cryptic and fragile way? > > -- > Miro Hrončok > -- > Phone: +420777974800 > IRC: mhroncok > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
