Re: Handling Upstream that has Diverging Licenses in Source Files but not LICENSE file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 2:06 PM Tim Flink <tflink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Does anyone have knowledge on how situations like this have been handled in the past?
>
I know in the past at least some packagers have submitted requests to
upstream to include the additional license texts but I don't know if
that was a general policy.

-Toshio
--
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux