Guidance needed regarding running `ant` in %prep

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

During review of a package I submitted [1], the reviewer asked me to move running an `ant` script from %prep to %build.

However, I feel that step belongs in %prep for two reasons:

1. It's a preparatory step for the Python build that follows

The `ant` job provides codec mappings (from Java Charsets), which are subsequently used in the Python package. The process is described in the CodecMapper README [2].

2. It would be (needlessly?) more complicated to do that in %build

I need to prep the sources and move stuff around for the Python package to live at the top level, before calling `%pyproject_buildrequires`, which is done before %build.

The actual Python package, from which the PyPI sdist and wheel are produced lives in a sub directory of the CodecMapper repository [3]. Unfortunately, the PyPI sdist is incomplete. That's why I'm using the GitHub sources.

I'd appreciate any guidance with regards to permissibility and/or alternative approaches.

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244402
[2] https://github.com/roskakori/CodecMapper#codecmapper
[3] https://github.com/roskakori/CodecMapper/tree/master/ebcdic

Cheers,

--
Sandro
FAS: gui1ty
IRC: Penguinpee
Elsewhere: [Pp]enguinpee
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux