On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 10:25 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > I accidentally realized today (in [1]), that RPM has a VCS tag. 396 Fedora > packages use it, yay \o/ > > The tag is described (at [2]) as: > > """ > (Public) upstream source code VCS location. Format <vcs>:<address> with <vcs> > being the VCS command used (e.g. git, svn, hg, …) and <address> being the > location of the repository as used by the VCS tool to clone/checkout the > repository (e.g. https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm.git). > """ > (snip) > Are the 396-11 packages wrong? I encountered this a few weeks ago too (due to https://pagure.io/fedora-rust/rust2rpm/pull-request/274). Short answer to your question: As far as I can tell, yes. Apparently 396-11 packages that use this tag in Fedora do it in a way that does *not* match what is documented in the RPM docs. Maybe there should be a discussion around deprecating the tag and removing it from packages, similar to what happened to Group tags? Fabio -- _______________________________________________ packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
