On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 6:19 PM Jilayne Lovejoy <jlovejoy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Is anyone opposed to moving those to the Fedora-legal docs pages on licensing? > > The pages we found were: > - https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Rust/#_license_for_binary_packages > - https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Rust/#_library_binary > - https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Golang/ Looking at the "Rust/#_license_for_binary_packages" section of the Rust packaging guidelines, this is just a reminder for packagers that they need to take static linking into account for Rust packages. And since that is entirely Rust-packager-centric information I don't think it should be moved to other docs where it's less "findable" for Rust packagers. We can add a link to the appropriate page of the Legal docs regarding "licensing for mutli-license projects" or "license of statically linked programs" once those are ready, though. The "Rust/#_library_binary" contains only an example file and nothing related to licensing at all. Did you paste the wrong link? Fabio _______________________________________________ packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
