V Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 01:54:10PM -0600, Jilayne Lovejoy napsal(a): > On 7/22/22 10:43 AM, Maxwell G wrote: > > Jul 22, 2022 11:37:18 AM Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > > There is some stuff I see relating to license file inclusion > > Are you talking about the `%golicenses` part? That's not a legal > > guideline. The go macros just have a special way of installing licenses, > > as opposed to marking them with %license in %files. This part should be > > kept in the Go Packaging Guidelines. > you're right, that is not a legal guideline - wrong link, too many windows > open! > > This one has a bit (that is now covered in the new docs and outdated) > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Perl/#_license_tag > This is there because most of the Perl packages uses this license combination. It helps packagers to identify the typical license correctly. Feel free to copy (and reword) it into licensing guidelines. Then Perl packaging guidelines will replace the section with a link to that advice in licensing guidelines. Is it Ok? Please only make the advice linkable. -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
