On Wed, 6 Nov 2024, Fabio Valentini via packaging wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 2:29 PM Peter Oliver via packaging
<packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This brings me to my second question. Spec files for different Tree-sitter parsers are pretty-much identical to each other, so should we generate them using macros?
This sounds like it would be a good idea, especially if all the
packages would be essentially identical other than having a different
"tree-sitter-$lang" name and source repo.
I have submitted a package review for a new package containing these macros, tree-sitter-srpm-macros.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2333124
There appears to be little immediate enthusiasm for building Python or Rust binding subpackages, so I have made that an opt-in feature that I have labelled as experimental.
--
Peter Oliver
--
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
