Yeah I may simply not bother with epel8 then and just keep building for epel9. We may simply retire lutris for epel8 in that case. I'm not really even sure how much interest there is for lutris on epel8...
Thanks for your opinion!
Le sam. 27 août 2022, 17 h 07, Maxwell G <gotmax@e.email> a écrit :
On Friday, August 26, 2022 Steve Cossette wrote:
> Now, I decided to contribute further by building the package for epel8 and
> epel9. I have been following the guide on
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Maintenanc
> e_Guide/, but did not know that doing so does not guarantee installation
> will be successful (specially if some of the packages set as 'Requires' are
> not available in the repos.... oops!)
Yes, you need to check that packages are installable. At least, you can run
`mock -r chroot_name_here --postinstall --source . --spec lutris.spec` or
`fedpkg mockbuild --postinstall` to build the package in a mock chroot and
ensures that it's actually installable.
> Python38-devel installs fine, but 3 subpackages keep failing, mainly
> python3.8(evdev), python3.8(pygobject) and python3.8(distro).
Yes, those packages are probably not available for python38. If you want to
support lutris on EPEL 8, you'd have to package up the dependencies. However,
I'd recommend targeting python39 instead of python38. If you're interested in
doing that, I'd be happy to provide some more pointers.
--
Thanks,
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His
_______________________________________________ packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
