On 22. 09. 21 22:48, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Wednesday, September 22, 2021 4:26:49 PM EDT Miro Hrončok wrote:
By chance do you have a pointer to one of those javascript files that is
misidentified? (Or any other for that matter). I'd like to see what's
going on and get a fix in place.
yarnpkg package, %prepped
$ file --mime-type yarn-1.22.10/bin/yarn.js
yarn-1.22.10/bin/yarn.js: application/javascript
application/javascript is, unfortunately, correct. This one is governed by
RFC 4329 which makes it official.
From all the scan that we've done on fullish installs in the past, there's
only 2 others that you might run across: application/x-elc (lisp) and
application/x-java-applet.
Maybe you just build in logic to workaround these 3 types? application/
javascript is really the only one I can think of that is common.
Yeah, maybe we should just do that. However, that would not cleanup the
executable pngs.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
