Re: load-spellchecking and no-manual-page-for-binary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



V Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 07:32:37PM +0200, Fabrice Creuzot napsal(a):
> Ok, perfect with aspell-fr + enchant2-aspell.
> So I replace hunspell-fr by aspell-fr!
>
May I know how did you make rpmlint to check a spelling? For me since the
replacement of rpmlint with rpmlint2, rpmlint does not report any
misspellings. I have installed:

rpmlint-2.4.0-8.fc39.noarch
enchant2-2.5.0-1.fc39.x86_64
python3-enchant-3.2.2-6.fc38.noarch
enchant2-aspell-2.5.0-1.fc39.x86_64
aspell-0.60.8-11.fc38.x86_64
aspell-en-2020.12.07-7.fc38.x86_64

Enchant itself works:

$ echo mispeling | enchant-2 -l -d en
mispeling

but running rpmlint on a spec file with the very same misspelled word in
a description does not report any error.

-- Petr

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux