Re: Guidelines: Should numbered patches be replaced by unnumbered in most of our examples?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 4:08 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
<zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 08:59:30PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've recently finally watched *Still packaging like it's 1999?* from
> > DevConf.CZ 2020 by Florian Festi.
> >
> > One thing that I've learned is that for many years now, we can do:
> >
> > Patch:          foo.patch
> > Patch:          bar.patch
> > Patch:          baz.patch
>
> Definitely.
>

We also can use %sourcelist and %patchlist for Debian-style series
lists in the spec file. This was also introduced in RPM 4.15.

For example:

%sourcelist
# Main source
foo-0.tar.gz
# distro README
bar-README

%patchlist
# Patch that foos
foo.patch
# Bar patch
bar.patch



--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux