On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 08:59:30PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello, > > I've recently finally watched *Still packaging like it's 1999?* from > DevConf.CZ 2020 by Florian Festi. > > One thing that I've learned is that for many years now, we can do: > > Patch: foo.patch > Patch: bar.patch > Patch: baz.patch Definitely. Zbyszek > Instead of the more traditional: > > > Patch1: foo.patch > Patch2: bar.patch > Patch3: baz.patch > > The same applies to sources. > > Should we adapt our examples in the packaging guidelines to prefer this > approach unless the patches/sources need to be referenced by their number in > %prep? It seems simpler. > > It has been supported since RPM 4.15 (hence not yet on RHEL 8). _______________________________________________ packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
