On Thu, 2024-10-10 at 14:01 +0200, Michael Schwendt via packaging wrote: > Hi! > > I'd like some feedback on the following scenario that had caused an > implicit > conflict because of moving shared libs from the main package to a > subpackage: > > > transaction failed: Rpm transaction failed. > > - file /usr/lib64/libtesseract.so.5.4.1 from install of > > tesseract-libs-5.4.1-4.fc41.x86_64 conflicts with file from package > > tesseract-5.4.1-2.fc41.x86_64 > > > The package maintainer's choice of a fix was to add > > Conflicts: tesseract < 5.4.1-4 > > to "tesseract-libs" whereas common packaging practice has been to > prefer > a strict dependency instead, with > > Requires: tesseract-libs%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} > > in package "tesseract". > > > In Fedora packaging we've tried to avoid explicit conflicts for many > years. > Searching the guidelines, I only find this entry from 2013, which is > about "acceptable use" but not a strict MUST: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Conflicts/#_splitting_packages we have this guideline https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-replacing-existing-packages > Could this be revisited and refined as to be clear about the scenario > of a package split? Specifically, _any_ file moved between > [sub]packages > could cause an implicit conflict during system updates. As such, > explicit > "Requires" have been the primary choice to add a strict dependency. > If > an explicit "Conflicts" tag is needed, the guidelines ought to make > that > clear. -- Sérgio M. B. -- _______________________________________________ packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue