* Dridi Boukelmoune: > It loos like somebody had already suggested moving away from LDFLAGS, > using LDLINKFLAGS instead, and the patch was merged 2 days after I > started this thread: > > https://todo.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/hare/784 > > So that's one conflict gone, but there is still no RPM macro support for > distro-wide linker flags for toolchains not relying on LDFLAGS in their > current form. > > My %{ld_ldflags} macro could be taking the problem from the wrong end: we > could instead have some %{link_ldflags} macro from which %{build_ldflags} > would be derived, turning command line arguments into `-Wl` options and > adding GCC-specific -specs options. Do you know if LDLINKFLAGS comes before -shared or after? If we use LDLINKFLAGS to enable PIE, it has to come first, so that -shared overrides it. We can handle this with -specs independently of order, but not directly in ld. Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
