On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 11:38 AM Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Dridi Boukelmoune: > > >> The hare toolchain should not use LDFLAGS if it doesn't use a > >> GCC-compatible compiler driver. > >> > >> But I don't see where it does that. Do you have a more precise > >> reference? > > > > See the man page: > > > > https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/hare/tree/master/item/docs/hare.scd > > Ah, looked at the wrong repository. I think we can't use LDFLAGS at all > with hare. Its startup probably won't support all our hardening. At least haredoc (built by hare) runs just fine on my machine. And hare was built with the same %{ld_ldflags}. Please note that the way my %{ld_ldflags} macro works, only "straight" arguments are passed and those coming from specs (redhat-hardened-ld and redhat-annobin-cc1) are simply ignored. _______________________________________________ packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
