Re: load-spellchecking and no-manual-page-for-binary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 10:56 AM Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Dne 07. 06. 23 v 20:49 Jason L Tibbitts III napsal(a):
> >>>>>> Fabrice Creuzot <code@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >> W: unable to load spellchecking dictionary for fr.
> > There is a French version of the package %description (%description -l fr)
> > but you do not have a French dictionary installed so rpmlint cannot do a
> > spelling check.  I believe installing hunspell-fr would help, or you can
> > ignore the complaing.
> >
> >>> awf-gtk4.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary awf-gtk4
> > rpmlint --explain no-manual-page-for-binary says "Each executable in
> > standard binary directories should have a man page."
> >
> > So the package installs an executable named "awf-gtk4" is installed, but
> > no corresponding manual page is installed.  It is nice if all
> > executables have manual pages, and you should check the source to make
> > sure that it doesn't include one which somehow isn't being installed,
> > but otherwise your options are:
> >
> > 1. See if someone else has written a manual page which you can include.
> > 2. Write one yourself.
>
>
> One option to consider is to use help2man:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-puma/blob/rawhide/f/rubygem-puma.spec#_106-112
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-puma/blob/rawhide/f/rubygem-puma.spec#_172-178

Does it actually make sense to do that though?
If the contents of the manpage is just a duplicate of the output of
"$binary --help", does it serve any purpose (except inflate package
size)?

Fabio
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux