Hi,
On February 11, 2023 1:26:46 PM UTC, Mattia Verga <mattia.verga@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>I'm trying to set up a clean upgrade path for celestia.
>Previously there was a monolithic 'celestia' package with everything inside it, now there will be a separate 'celestia-data' package (from a different source repository), while the former 'celestia' package will be splitted in 'celestia-common', 'celestia-gtk' and 'celestia-qt'.
>
>The plan is that when a user upgrade from pre 1.7, it should end up with 'celestia-gtk' as default interface, which requires both 'celestia-common' and 'celestia-data'.
>
>I have set the 'celestia' specfile as follows:
>%package common
>Obsoletes: %{name} < 1.6.3
>
>%package gtk
>Requires: %{name}-common%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
>Provides: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
I'd suggest to try to add the Provides: to both packages (and maybe the obsoletes as well), maybe that will be enough so that dnf will erase the old package first.
>I have prepared a build at https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mattia/Astronomy/build/5517618/
>
>When running an upgrade coming from pre 1.7, I get:
># dnf upgrade celestia --refresh
>...
>==========================================================================================
> Package Arch Version Repository Size
>==========================================================================================
>Installing:
> celestia-common x86_64 1.7.0~202302239c1c4e4-0.3.fc37
> copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:mattia:Astronomy 2.0 M
> sostituisce celestia.x86_64 1.6.2-0.8.beta3.fc37
>Installazione dipendenze:
> celestia-data noarch 1.7.0~20230223ffc806d-1.fc37
> copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:mattia:Astronomy 281 M
> celestia-gtk x86_64 1.7.0~202302239c1c4e4-0.3.fc37
> copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:mattia:Astronomy 76 k
>...
>Errore: Errore test di transazione:
> il file /usr/share/celestia/fonts dell'installazione di celestia-common-1.7.0~202302239c1c4e4-0.3.fc37.x86_64 entra in conflitto con il file del pacchetto celestia-1.6.2-0.8.beta3.fc37.x86_64
>
>So, dnf correctly finds that celestia-common obsoletes celestia, still it complains about conflicting files.... ?
>Have I set up something wrong?
>_______________________________________________
>packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
