On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 8:55 AM Remi Collet <Fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Le 08/09/2021 à 14:31, Neal Gompa a écrit : > > On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 7:59 AM Remi Collet <Fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> From Guidelines: > >> > >> > Note that some new packages may be exempt from the review process. > >> > >> > The package is being created so that multiple versions of the same > >> package can coexist in the distribution ... > >> > >> > >> We already have lot of packages in the PHP stack which seems to apply to > >> this exception (all have been reviewed) > >> > >> And some other are mostly ready, examples: > >> > >> php-cs-fixer3 from php-cs-fixer (v2) > >> php-doctrine-cache2 from php-doctrine-cache (v1) > >> php-monolog2 from php-Monolog (v1) > >> php-phpseclib3 from php-phpseclib3 (v2) > >> > >> > >> Can you please confirm that the exception apply here > >> and that I can use the fedpkg with --exception flag ? > >> > > > > The exception is intended for older versions, not newer ones. You do > > it backwards for PHP stuff, which doesn't qualify for this. > > So if I create php-cs-fixer2 > and update php-cs-fixer to v3, this is OK ? > Yes. The reason this is fine is because the exception is intended for packages that effectively already exist in the distribution. We already shipped php-cs-fixer v2, so making it a versioned package doesn't change much. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
