On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 11:22 AM Maxwell G <gotmax@e.email> wrote: > As part of this change, the data on which licenses are GPL-compatible > seems to have been removed. Other projects were relying on > this (e.g. [1]). Are there any plans to add it back? No, we decided not to maintain this information going forward. I can go into why I don't think it's worthwhile, if there's interest. We probably will add some documentation addressing the issue. > [1]: https://github.com/ansible-collections/overview/blob/main/collection_requirements.rst#id5 There are so few non-legacy, today-commonly-used, generally-accepted-as-FOSS licenses that are not viewed as GPLv3-compatible that I think it might be better for Ansible to just list those (the only one I can think of is EPL-2.0), or to list a small set of recommended/acceptable commonly-used FOSS licenses. Richard _______________________________________________ packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
