Re: Should macro packages co-own /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d, require rpm or do nothing?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 16. 01. 23 18:19, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Good catch. Can we have dependency generator for this?

Not if co-owning is one of the recommended options.

BTW the guidelines could include this information:

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_packaging_of_additional_rpm_macros

My plan is to propose a guideline after this discussion settles.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux