Hi Miro, On March 31, 2023 10:06:14 AM UTC, "Miro Hrončok" <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On 30. 03. 23 23:55, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> Hello Python packagers. >> >> RPM 4.19 introduces this feature: >> >> https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/manual/dynamic_specs.html >> >> I decided to write this email to gather my thoughts. I believe that with this, we can turn manual Python extras subpackages like this: >> >> %package -n python3-... >> Summary: %{summary} >> >> %description -n python3-... %_description >> >> %pyproject_extras_subpkg -n python3-xxx extra1 extra2 >> >> (See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#Extras for what that means.) >> >> Into something like this: >> >> %package -n python3-... >> Summary: %{summary} >> >> %description -n python3-... %_description >> ... >> >> %install >> %pyproject_install >> ... >> %pyproject_generate_extras_subpkgs -n python3-xxx >> >> >> The %pyproject_generate_extras_subpkgs macro would parse the installed .dist-info directory to find out what extras are available and generate subpackages for all of them. > >One challenge: When an extra is removed upstream, the packager might not notice that it needs to be provided/obsole> That is indeed a problem. What if we made the macro require the list of subpackages (e.g. as a comma separated string) as an argument? The if the packager wouldn't notice the removal, they'd get a build error. Cheers, Dan _______________________________________________ packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
