Re: Should we have rpm package policies tying extension packages to the GNOME versions they'll work with?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 03:27:17PM +0000, Gwyn Ciesla wrote:
> I agree that we need some mechanism to keep this working, but Requires
> might indeed be too strict. Would a
> 
> BuildRequires >= (the version it wants) 
> 
> or something help? That way the existing versions would still be in the
> repo, and maintainers wouldn't easily push new versions that aren't
> supported.
> 
> Disclaimer, I've not yet finished my first tea.

It's the opposite problem I'm mostly concerned with. However, this would at
least make them FTBFS if they aren't marked as supporting the current GNOME,
which would at least clean up the ones that have been lingering for a long
time.

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux