IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- New IRTF RG chartered--Scalable Adaptive Multicast (SAM) RG
- RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt
- New IRTF RG chartered--Scalable Adaptive Multicast (SAM) RG
- IETF 2008 - 2010 Meeting Calendar Adopted
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
- Re: Last Call: 'A Process Experiment in Normative Reference Handling' to Experimental RFC (draft-klensin-norm-ref)
- RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt
- RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt
- RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt
- RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt
- RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
- RE: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- From: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- IETF, IAB, & RFC-Editor
- Re: [TLS] Review of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-05
- From: Angelos D. Keromytis
- Re: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: Last Call: 'A Process Experiment in Normative Reference Handling' to Experimental RFC (draft-klensin-norm-ref)
- RE: Last Call: 'A Process Experiment in Normative Reference Handl ing' to Experimental RFC (draft-klensin-norm-ref)
- RE: Last Call: 'A Process Experiment in Normative Reference Handl ing' to Experimental RFC (draft-klensin-norm-ref)
- Re: Last Call: 'A Process Experiment in Normative Reference Handling' to Experimental RFC (draft-klensin-norm-ref)
- Re: Last Call: 'A Process Experiment in Normative Reference Handling' to Experimental RFC (draft-klensin-norm-ref)
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control
- EAP Extensions (EAPExt) BoF Proposal Discussion
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control
- RE: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control
- Out-of-Office AutoReply: draft-ietf-geopriv-location-types-registry-06.txt updated by Amy Vezza
- Creation of nettest mailing list
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control
- Re: IETF-SDO liaison
- Re: IETF-SDO liaison (was Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?)
- RE: IETF-SDO liaison (was Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?)
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control
- IETF-SDO liaison (was Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?)
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control
- RE: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- RE: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?,
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- RFC 3066 double Bis?
- From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt
- RE: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?)
- AW: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actuallyuseful?)
- AW: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt
- From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- received processing power
- From: Ashfaaq H Poonawala
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt
- From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- automatic discovery [Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?]
- Re: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?)
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- RE: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?)
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt
- RE: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?)
- Re: Kerberos
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?)
- RE: Kerberos
- PANA vs. RADIUS/Diameter (RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?)
- Re: Kerberos
- Re: AW: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- From: Mohan Parthasarathy
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- RE: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?)
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- RE: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?)
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control
- Re: Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?)
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- EAP/IKEv2 as an alternative to PANA (RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?)
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control
- Complexity (was RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?)
- Framework document scope (RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?)
- NEA scope (RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?)
- RE: Kerberos
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- AW: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Kerberos
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA partly useful?
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- From: "Antonio F. Gómez Skarmeta"
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- From: "Antonio F. Gómez Skarmeta"
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- From: "Antonio F. Gómez Skarmeta"
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: Last Call: 'SMTP Submission Service Extension for Future Message Release' to Proposed Standard (draft-vaudreuil-futuredelivery)
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ash-alt-formats-02.txt
- From: Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS
- RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt
- RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt
- From: Stephen Hayes (TX/EUS)
- RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt
- From: Stephen Hayes (TX/EUS)
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control
- Re: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control
- Last Call: IETF Calendar 2008 - 2010 Ver 02
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR
- RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR
- RE: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt
- From: Stephen Hayes (TX/EUS)
- Re: LC on draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt
- Call for Entries, Deadline 15th June 2006
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR
- Tracking IPR (Re: RFC Author Count and IPR)
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: cApitalization
- Re: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt
- Re: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt
- Re: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- ARPAnet's Problems Persist Unsolved Today
- Re: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt
- RE: [TLS] Review of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-05
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: Authors and Editors (was Re: RFC Author Count and IPR)
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Authors and Editors (was Re: RFC Author Count and IPR)
- RE: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR
- RE: RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR
- RE: [TLS] Review of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-05
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR
- RE: RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR
- From: Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR
- RE: RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: cApitalization
- Re: cApitalization
- RE: [TLS] Review of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-05
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR
- Re: RFC Author Count and IPR
- From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- RFC Author Count and IPR
- [Sam Hartman] [Ietf-http-auth] BOF Request: WARP - Web Authentication Resistant to Phishing
- The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
- Re: cApitalization
- Re: Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt
- Re: cApitalization
- RE: [TLS] Review of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-05
- Re: cApitalization
- Questions about draft-lear-iana-no-more-well-known-ports-00.txt
- Re: [TLS] Review of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-05
- RE: cApitalization
- From: Bob O'Hara (boohara)
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- cApitalization
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- Review of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-05
- FW: Fwd: TLS authorizations draft
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- Re: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp)
- Re: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp)
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt
- Re: Fwd: TLS authorizations draft
- Re: Fwd: TLS authorizations draft
- RE: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- RE: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- RE: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- negotiation of the parameters of SIP
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt
- Re: Last Call: 'IETF Process and Operations Documentss' to Experimental RFC (draft-alvestrand-ipod)
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt
- Re: Last Call: 'IETF Process and Operations Documentss' to Experimental RFC (draft-alvestrand-ipod)
- cdma 2000
- From: Ashfaaq H Poonawala
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt
- Re: Last Call: 'IETF Process and Operations Documentss' to Experimental RFC (draft-alvestrand-ipod)
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- Re: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp)
- Re: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp)
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- Fwd: TLS authorizations draft
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- RE: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- Re: FW: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- Fwd: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- appeal against an IESG decision
- From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- Re: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- FW: Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Last Call: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting Calendar
- RE: Last Call: 'Experimental Procedure for Long Term Suspensionsfrom Mailing Lists' to Experimental RFC
- Re: Last Call: 'Experimental Procedure for Long Term Suspensions from Mailing Lists' to Experimental RFC
- Re: Last Call: 'Experimental Procedure for Long Term Suspensions from Mailing Lists' to Experimental RFC
- RE: policy enforcement points and management [RE: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp)]
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Possible new work items in the General Area
- Announcement! Call for Entries.
- RE: policy enforcement points and management [RE: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp)]
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- policy enforcement points and management [RE: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp)]
- RE: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Off topic: Montreal pipe organ builder tour
- RE: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp)
- RE: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp)
- Re: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp)
- Re: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp)
- Re: Last Call: 'NAT Behavioral Requirements for Unicast UDP' to BCP (draft-ietf-behave-nat-udp)
- Re: comments on <draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt>
- preserving unity within lingual and technical diversity
- From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- preserving unity within lingual and technical diversity
- From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: comments on <draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt>
- RE: comments on <draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt>
- From: Stephen Hayes (TX/EUS)
- comments on <draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt>
- Re: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review of draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-01.txt
- Announcement of the new work : Link Characteristic Information for Mobility
- From: Soohong Daniel Park
- RE: Perils of Last Minute Change (Was: RE: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review ofdraft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-01.txt)
- RE: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review ofdraft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-01.txt
- Re: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review ofdraft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-01.txt
- Re: Perils of Last Minute Change (Was: RE: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review ofdraft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-01.txt)
- Perils of Last Minute Change (Was: RE: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review ofdraft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-01.txt)
- RE: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review ofdraft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-01.txt
- How widely have the Seamoby CARD and CXTP protocols been deployed?
- Re: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review of draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-01.txt
- Re: draft on network-based mobility management
- RE: draft on network-based mobility management
- Re: draft on network-based mobility management
- draft on network-based mobility management
- Location Change for IETF 67
- Re: 2005-2006 NomCom Announcement
- Re: Last Call: 'The Tao of IETF - A Novice's Guide to the Internet Engineering Task Force' to Informational RFC
- 2005-2006 NomCom Announcement
- Upcoming APPs area interim meeting (LEMONADE and EAI)
- Re: Appeal of AD Decision to uphold Atompub ban
- Re: Possible new work items in the General Area
- Re: Possible new work items in the General Area
- Re: Possible General Area MiniBOF 2: WG Procedures
- Re: Possible General Area MiniBOF 2: WG Procedures
- Re: Possible General Area MiniBOF 1: IESG structure and charter
- Re: IETF lists as RSS?
- Re: Possible General Area MiniBOF 1: IESG structure and charter
- Possible General Area MiniBOF 3: Appeals procedures
- Possible General Area MiniBOF 4: Mailing lists management procedures
- Possible General Area MiniBOF 2: WG Procedures
- Possible new work items in the General Area
- Possible General Area MiniBOF 1: IESG structure and charter
- Re: IETF Meeting Survey - Last Call
- Re: IETF Meeting Survey - Last Call
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12
- Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12
- Re: IETF lists as RSS?
- Re: IETF lists as RSS?
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Summer of Code: Event notification service for the IETF
- Re: IETF lists as RSS?
- Re: IETF lists as RSS?
- Re: IETF Meeting Survey - Last Call
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: IETF lists as RSS?
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: IETF lists as RSS?
- RE: IETF Meeting Survey - Last Call
- RE: IETF Meeting Survey - Last Call
- Re: IETF lists as RSS?
- IETF lists as RSS?
- Re: IETF Meeting Survey - Last Call
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: IETF Meeting Survey - Last Call
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Thinking about interim meeting dates
- Re: IETF Meeting Survey - Last Call
- Re: IETF Meeting Survey - Last Call
- IETF Meeting Survey - Last Call
- Re: Seeking... IAB Executive Director
- Re: 66th IETF - Registration and Hotel Accommodations
- Re: 66th IETF - Registration and Hotel Accommodations
- Re: 66th IETF - Registration and Hotel Accommodations
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: 66th IETF - Registration and Hotel Accommodations
- Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-idn-nextsteps-05
- From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-idn-nextsteps-05
- Re: [Fwd: Re: 66th IETF - Registration and Hotel Accommodations]
- RE: [Fwd: Re: 66th IETF - Registration and Hotel Accommodations]
- RE: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-idn-nextsteps-05
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-idn-nextsteps-05
- IETF 65 Survey
- Re: 66th IETF - Registration and Hotel Accommodations
- Re: 66th IETF - Registration and Hotel Accommodations
- Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-idn-nextsteps-05
- Re: 66th IETF - Registration and Hotel Accommodations
- Re: 66th IETF - Registration and Hotel Accommodations
- RE: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: 66th IETF - Registration and Hotel Accommodations
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Merging PIDF documents from multiple sources
- Re: Impending publication: draft-iab-idn-nextsteps-05
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: 66th IETF - Registration and Hotel Accommodations
- Re: 66th IETF - Registration and Hotel Accommodations
- Re: 66th IETF - Registration and Hotel Accommodations
- From: Dimitri . Papadimitriou
- Re: 66th IETF - Registration and Hotel Accommodations
- Re: 66th IETF - Registration and Hotel Accommodations
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: IPv6 Subsets?
- Re: IPv6 Subsets?
- Re: IPv6 Subsets?
- Re: IPv6 Subsets?
- Re: IPv6 Subsets?
- IPv6 Subsets?
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Unannounced list status changes considered harmful
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- RE: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: Unannounced list status changes considered harmful
- RE: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- RE: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- RE: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- RE: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- RE: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- RE: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: Last Call: 'The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings' to Proposed Standard
- RE: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: Last Call: 'The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings' to Proposed Standard
- RE: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- RE: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [ppml] [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: RFC Editor and 2006 timeline
- Re: Clarification of my comment on giving up on process issues
- From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: Unannounced list status changes considered harmful
- Re: Clarification of my comment on giving up on process issues
- RE: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: RFC Editor and 2006 timeline
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Clarification of my comment on giving up on process issues
- RE: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: Clarification of my comment on giving up on process issues
- RE: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: Unannounced list status changes considered harmful
- Re: Clarification of my comment on giving up on process issues
- Re: Syslog inquiry, what is TAG delimiter with regard to RFC 3164
- Re: Unannounced list status changes considered harmful
- Unannounced list status changes considered harmful (was: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx)
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- From: william(at)elan.net
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- RE: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- RE: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- RE: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- RE: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- RE: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- RE: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- RE: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- Re: [narten@xxxxxxxxxx: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- Re: RFC Editor and 2006 timeline
- Re: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- Re: RFC Editor and 2006 timeline
- Re: RFC Editor and 2006 timeline
- Re: RFC Editor and 2006 timeline
- RE: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- RE: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- RE: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- Re: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- Re: Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-hash-stuffing-05.txt
- RE: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-hash-stuffing-05.txt
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- Re: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- Re: Last Call: 'The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings' to Proposed Standard
- Re: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- RE: RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- Re: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- Re: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- Re: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Copyright status of early RFCs
- Re: RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- Re: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- From: Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- From: Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- From: Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: Last Call: 'The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings' to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: 'The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings' to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: 'The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings' to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: 'The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings' to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: 'The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings' to Proposed Standard
- RE: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- RE: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports
- Re: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- Re: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- Re: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- Re: Copyright status of early RFCs
- From: Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: Copyright status of early RFCs
- Re: Copyright status of early RFCs
- Re: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- Re: Copyright status of early RFCs
- Re: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- Re: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
- Re: Copyright status of early RFCs
- From: Anthony G. Atkielski
- Re: Copyright status of early RFCs
- Re: Copyright status of early RFCs
- Re: Seeking... IAB Executive Director
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- RE: Copyright status of early RFCs
- Re: Copyright status of early RFCs
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- Re: Copyright status of early RFCs
- Re: Copyright status of early RFCs
- Re: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting dates
- Re: Copyright status of early RFCs
- Re: Copyright status of early RFCs
- Re: Copyright status of early RFCs
- Re: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting dates
- Re: Copyright status of early RFCs
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports
- Seeking... IAB Executive Director
- RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06
- From: Bob O'Hara (boohara)
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports
- Re: Guidance needed on well known ports
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06
- RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06
- From: Bob O'Hara (boohara)
- RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06
- Copyright status of early RFCs
- Sorry about the posting errors regarding the dkim draft.
- draft-ietf-dkim-threats-02 nit//Affects verification of messages?
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- From: Anthony G. Atkielski
- RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06
- RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06
- From: Bob O'Hara (boohara)
- a WG-USERS? (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them).
- From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- Syslog inquiry, what is TAG delimiter with regard to RFC 3164
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- From: Anthony G. Atkielski
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- RE: draft-santesson-tls-ume Last Call comment
- Re: the iab & net neutrality
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- From: Lars-Erik Jonsson (LU/EAB)
- Syslog inquiry, TAG delimiters.
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard
- RE: Announcement of IAB member selection
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Announcement of IAB member selection
- Re: Announcement of IAB member selection
- RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.
- Re: Announcement of IAB member selection
- Announcement of IAB member selection
- RE: Don't feed the trolls
- Re: 128 bits should be enough for everyone, was:
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Announcements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]