IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communication here...
  • From: todd glassey
• Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communication here...
  • From: Fleischman, Eric
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...
  • From: todd glassey
• RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackofcommunicaiton here...
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack ofcommunicaiton here...
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Michael Thomas
• RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack ofcommunicaiton here...
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack ofcommunicaiton here...
  • From: todd glassey
• RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt)
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack ofcommunicaiton here...
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Andrew Newton
• Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt)
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: www.ietf.org unresponsive over IPv6?
  • From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
• IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt)
  • From: Brian Carpenter
• Re: Size of pool (Was: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...)
  • From: bmanning
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Bill Fenner
• NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt)
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt)
  • From: Pekka Savola
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• 3797 details (was: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Avri Doria
• Why was the trust setup as a Va. Entity? & no FTC linkage.
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Theodore Tso
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: NomCom 2006/07: Selection Process Reset
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt)
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
• Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt)
  • From: Pekka Savola
• IETF Meetings 68 & 69
  • From: rpelletier
• Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt)
  • From: Thomas Narten
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: www.ietf.org unresponsive over IPv6?
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• RE: Fixing the algorithm
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Fixing the algorithm
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: www.ietf.org unresponsive over IPv6?
  • From: Jeroen Massar
• Re: www.ietf.org unresponsive over IPv6?
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt)
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• RE: Fixing the algorithm
  • From: Yaakov Stein
• Re: www.ietf.org unresponsive over IPv6?
  • From: Jeroen Massar
• Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav)
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• www.ietf.org unresponsive over IPv6?
  • From: Tim Chown
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Yaakov Stein
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: NomCom 2006/07: Selection Process Reset
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: NomCom 2006/07: Selection Process Reset
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: NomCom 2006/07: Selection Process Reset
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Size of pool (Was: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...)
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Scott Bradner
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Scott Bradner
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Fixing the algorithm
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Theodore Tso
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Pete Resnick
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Eliot Lear
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: NomCom 2006/07: Selection Process Reset
  • From: John Leslie
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Cimbala, Matthew
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: James Galvin
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: James Galvin
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: James Galvin
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Leslie Daigle
• Re: Last call comment on 'XML Pipelining with Chunks for the
  • From: Andrew Newton
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Ned Freed
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav)
  • From: Cyrus Daboo
• Last call comment on 'XML Pipelining with Chunks for the
  • From: Rick Jelliffe
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Richard Shockey
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Lars-Erik Jonsson (LU/EAB)
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Henk Uijterwaal
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Michael StJohns
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Michael StJohns
• What is going on with the NOMCOM
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Resend: RE: What is going on with the NOMCOM
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and, variations' to BCP
  • From: Elwyn Davies
• Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav)
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav)
  • From: Lisa Dusseault
• Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav)
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav)
  • From: Bernard Desruisseaux
• Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav)
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav)
  • From: Bernard Desruisseaux
• Re: Measurements at IETF65.
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: Measurements at IETF65.
  • From: Andrea G Forte
• I'm looking for Pacific Islanders on the IETF
  • From: Franck Martin
• Measurements at IETF65.
  • From: Andrea G Forte
• Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav)
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: One Mistake and One Question of RFC2812.
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Last Call: 'Requirements for Multicast in L3 Provider-Provisioned VPNs' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-l3vpn-ppvpn-mcast-reqts)
  • From: benjamin.niven-jenkins
• One Mistake and One Question of RFC2812.
  • From: huangxiangkui
• Re: [midcom] RE: Last Call: 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Middlebox Communication' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-midcom-mib)
  • From: Pyda Srisuresh
• Re: [Fwd: IETF Process discussions - next steps]
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Fwd: IETF Process discussions - next steps]
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Fwd: IETF Process discussions - next steps]
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Fwd: IETF Process discussions - next steps]
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Fwd: IETF Process discussions - next steps]
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: [Fwd: IETF Process discussions - next steps]
  • From: Andy Bierman
• RE: [Fwd: IETF Process discussions - next steps]
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• [Fwd: IETF Process discussions - next steps]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Ltru] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Language Tag Registry Update (ltru)
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Two other RFCs to be published as Historic (was Re: Expedited Handling Request for draft-ietf-ltru-registry, draft-ietf-ltru-matching, and draft-ietf-ltru-initial)
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Language Tag Registry Update (ltru)
  • From: Doug Ewell
• Re: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license)
  • From: James M Snell
• Re: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Train to San Diego (was 'Meetings in other regions')
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Deploying v6 was: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license)
  • From: James M Snell
• RE: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only
  • From: Shah, Himanshu
• knowing the technical background (was: Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only)
  • From: JFC Morfin
• Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Taxi LAX-SAN (was 'Meetings in other regions')
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Randall Gellens
• RE: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Paul E. Jones
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only
  • From: Elwyn Davies
• Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the I nternet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-cr isp-iris-lwz)
  • From: Andrew Newton
• Announcement of mailing list for pre-congestion notification (PCN)
  • From: Bruce Davie
• Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the I nternet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-cr isp-iris-lwz)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the I nternet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-cr isp-iris-lwz)
  • From: Gray, Eric
• Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only
  • From: Shane Amante
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
  • From: Mark Townsley
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only
  • From: Pekka Savola
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
  • From: Andrew Newton
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
  • From: Ted Faber
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
  • From: Ted Faber
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
  • From: Todd Glassey
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
  • From: william(at)elan.net
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
  • From: Andrew Newton
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
  • From: kent crispin
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
  • From: Andrew Newton
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
  • From: Andrew Newton
• Re: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license)
  • From: James M Snell
• Re: RFP Question for you Jorge... did anyone put a notice of "Responsibility for Copyright Violations" to the Publisher RFP Candidates?
  • From: Todd Glassey
• Re: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• RFP and BCP addition - receipt needs to be generated & RFC's that revise IETF process.
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: draft-jennings-impp-vcard-07
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: ID Tracker State Update Notice: draft-laganier-ipv6-khi
  • From: julien . laganier
• re: administrative question on RFC publications
  • From: Joyce Reynolds
• Re: New Version Notification - draft-laganier-ipv6-khi-04.txt
  • From: julien . laganier
• draft-jennings-impp-vcard-07
  • From: Brian Suda
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
  • From: Marcos Sanz/Denic
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
  • From: Andrew Newton
• Re: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license)
  • From: James M Snell
• Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Autoreply: away from desk
  • From: Olaf M. Kolkman
• re: administrative question on RFC publications
  • From: JFC Morfin
• RFP Question for you Jorge... did anyone put a notice of "Responsibility for Copyright Violations" to the Publisher RFP Candidates?
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: todd glassey
• RE: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: JFC Morfin
• Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Colin Perkins
• RE: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Paul E. Jones
• RE: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Yaakov Stein
• Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Paul E. Jones
• Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Paul E. Jones
• Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: todd glassey
• RE: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Paul E. Jones
• Re: administrative question on RFC publications
  • From: JFC Morfin
• Re: administrative question on RFC publications
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: administrative question on RFC publications
  • From: JFC Morfin
• Re: administrative question on RFC publications
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: administrative question on RFC publications
  • From: todd glassey
• administrative question on RFC publications
  • From: Jefsey Morfin
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]
  • From: JFC Morfin
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]
  • From: Gray, Eric
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]
  • From: JFC Morfin
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• RE: [INDEP] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Gray, Eric
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Yaakov Stein
• Re: [INDEP] Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Dave Crocker
• [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Yaakov Stein
• Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• RFC 4612 - historic status
  • From: Yaakov Stein
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Yaakov Stein
• Re: [INDEP] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Todd Glassey
• Re: [INDEP] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: [INDEP] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Yaakov Stein
• Re: pet request
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Yaakov Stein
• pet request (was Re: draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions-01.txt)
  • From: JFC Morfin
• draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions-01.txt
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• 16ng Interim - September 12-13, Frankfurt
  • From: Soohong Daniel Park
• Re: [INDEP] Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: [INDEP] Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [INDEP] Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: Last Call: 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Middlebox Communication' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-midcom-mib)
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• RE: Clustered Signaling Gateways specifications
  • From: Ajay goel
• Re: Clustered Signaling Gateways specifications
  • From: Todd Glassey
• Clustered Signaling Gateways specifications
  • From: Satya Prasad Nemana
• Level Compression Recovery
  • From: Renato Fabbri
• Re: Document Action: 'Requirements for IETF Technical Publication Service' to Informational RFC
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Autoreply: away from desk
  • From: Olaf M. Kolkman
• RFC Editor RFP Announcement
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: Terms used in rules-update-07
  • From: Todd Glassey
• RE: Mandatory numeric examples in crypto-RFCs?
  • From: Bob Braden
• Re: [INDEP] Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Reque
  • From: Bob Braden
• Re: Novell IETF bag
  • From: Tom.Petch
• Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav)
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Last Call: 'Document Shepherding From Working Group Last Call to IESG Approval' to Informational RFC
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Novell IETF bag
  • From: Sandy Wills
• Re: Novell IETF bag
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Lee
• Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Andy Bierman
• RE: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Gray, Eric
• Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Theodore Tso
• Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Mandatory numeric examples in crypto-RFCs?
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: todd glassey
• Proposal for slightly modified vetting commitment.
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Todd Glassey
• Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: regarding Editors and their 'recreating new ip'...
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Leslie Daigle
• Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Todd Glassey
• Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Joe Touch
• Draft minutes from General Area open meeting
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Draft Wednesday plenary minutes
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: todd glassey
• regarding Editors and their 'recreating new ip'...
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Mandatory numeric examples in crypto-RFCs?
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Allison Mankin
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: Mandatory numeric examples in crypto-RFCs?
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Ted Hardie
• RE: Mandatory numeric examples in crypto-RFCs?
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Mandatory numeric examples in crypto-RFCs?
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL
  • From: todd glassey
• Mandatory numeric examples in crypto-RFCs?
  • From: Hadmut Danisch
• Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Leslie Daigle
• Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL
  • From: Russ Allbery
• Re: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL
  • From: todd glassey
• RE: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL
  • From: Brian Rosen
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL
  • From: Jeffrey Altman
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Ted Hardie
• OT - Post-SOX Thinking in US Public Companies (was Re: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL)
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: John C Klensin
• Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Allison Mankin
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: JFC Morfin
• RE: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Brian Rosen
• Re: Minutes and jabber logs
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Minutes and jabber logs
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Novell IETF bag
  • From: Philip Matthews
• Re: netwrk stuff
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: IANA, Unicode, and the multilingual Internet
  • From: JFC Morfin
• RE: RFC Editor Function SOW Review
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: Minutes and jabber logs
  • From: Gray, Eric
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• RE: RFC Editor Function SOW Review
  • From: Fleischman, Eric
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: IETF Administrative Director
• RE: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Tony Hain
• Re: netwrk stuff
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Todd Glassey
• Re: netwrk stuff
  • From: Todd Glassey
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• IANA, Unicode, and the multilingual Internet
  • From: Martin Duerst
• Re: Appeals, post-appeal discussions, DoS attacks on the IETF, and the depth of turtles
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: Appeals, post-appeal discussions, DoS attacks on the IETF, and the depth of turtles
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Appeals, post-appeal discussions, DoS attacks on the IETF, and the depth of turtles
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions)
  • From: Clint Chaplin
• Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: todd glassey
• Question about the folks providing the WG Mailing List services?
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Appeal's purposes (was appeals, post-appeal, etc.)
  • From: JFC Morfin
• Re: Appeals, post-appeal discussions, DoS attacks on the IETF, and the depth of turtles
  • From: JFC Morfin
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: netwrk stuff
  • From: todd glassey
• Appeals, post-appeal discussions, DoS attacks on the IETF, and the depth of turtles
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions)
  • From: Scott W Brim
• draft-carpenter-ietf-disputes [Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: netwrk stuff
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: netwrk stuff
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review
  • From: Todd Glassey
• Re: netwrk stuff
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review
  • From: Joe Touch
• RE: netwrk stuff
  • From: David Harrington
• Re: netwrk stuff
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: netwrk stuff
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: todd glassey
• RE: netwrk stuff
  • From: Nelson, David
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: netwrk stuff
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: JFC Morfin
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Bob Braden
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: John Levine
• Re: San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: Theodore Tso
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Tom.Petch
• RE: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Tony Hain
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Burger, Eric
• tsv-area mailing list
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: JFC Morfin
• Re: San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions)
  • From: Clint Chaplin
• Re: LA -> San Diego transportation (Was: Re: Meetings in other regions)
  • From: Clint Chaplin
• Re: San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions)
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: LA -> San Diego transportation (Was: Re: Meetings in other regions)
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Re: San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions)
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions)
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• Re: LA -> San Diego transportation (Was: Re: Meetings in other regions)
  • From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist
• Re: LA -> San Diego transportation (Was: Re: Meetings in other regions)
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions)
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions)
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Tony Hansen
• Re: LA -> San Diego transportation (Was: Re: Meetings in other regions)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Minutes and jabber logs
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Robert Elz
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Bill Fenner
• Re: San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions)
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• The IETF's Standadrs Process should produce a Intellectual Property Portfolio
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: todd glassey
• RE: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Burger, Eric
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• No code of conduct. No "hold-harmless" sections of the IETF's participation agreements has an interesting effect...
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: todd glassey
• San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions)
  • From: Burger, Eric
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Bill Fenner
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Bob Braden
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Scott Kitterman
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• Re: LA -> San Diego transportation (Was: Re: Meetings in other regions)
  • From: Clint Chaplin
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Geoff Huston
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• RE: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Paul Hoffman
• LA -> San Diego transportation (Was: Re: Meetings in other regions)
  • From: Doug Barton
• Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review
  • From: Marcus Leech
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• Re: Minutes and jabber logs
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: Minutes and jabber logs
  • From: Todd Glassey
• Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review
  • From: Todd Glassey
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: Todd Glassey
• Re: Minutes and jabber logs
  • From: Todd Glassey
• RE: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Todd Glassey
• RE: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Richard Shockey
• RE: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Minutes and jabber logs
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Minutes and jabber logs
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: Minutes and jabber logs
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Minutes and jabber logs
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Pasi.Eronen
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: questions about Dallas money
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• RE: The IETF 66 Attendees Alias
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: The IETF 66 Attendees Alias
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: John L
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: YAO Jiankang
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: John L
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: YAO Jiankang
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: John Levine
• RE: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Stephen Casner
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: JFC Morfin
• Re: Response to the Appeal by JFC Morfin dated 2006-02-17
  • From: JFC Morfin
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: The Accountable Web RE: not listening
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Scott W Brim
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Fred Baker
• RE: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Lyndon Nerenberg
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Re: Minutes and jabber logs
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: Meetings in other regions
  • From: John C Klensin
• Minutes and jabber logs
  • From: David Harrington
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Stephen Campbell
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: bmanning
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Edward Lewis
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Melinda Shore
• Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Response to the Appeal by JFC Morfin dated 2006-02-17
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Jeffrey Altman
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• RE: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Pasi.Eronen
• Re: +1
  • From: Tim Bray
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: +1
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Meetings in other regions
  • From: JFC Morfin
• RE: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: Meetings in other regions
  • From: Stephane H. Maes