Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Keith,
>
> wtf?  no, you can't make incremental changes and expect the result to
> work better than what we have now.  in all probability it will work
> worse, much worse.  the standards process has to balance various
> factors (e.g quality vs. timeliness).  if you change one aspect at a
> time without changing the others you throw the thing out of balance. 
> John's right - it's a recipe for disaster, and it's completely
> unacceptable as a means of moving forward.

And this is fear mongering with a complete lack of specifics.  Send
text, not fear.

Eliot

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]