So then Frank - this is an opportunity to not only correct that, but also to create a CI nexus which would be a good thing for the IETF to focus on I think. At least from a Business Development venue, it seems to offer a whole possibility of a new CI Area in the IETF as well. That would mean a new AD and a new seat for the IESG as well as probably a bunch of WG's which would popup to address standardization of many things that governments of the World are frantically trying to accomplish now. t ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Ellermann" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <ietf@xxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 12:24 PM Subject: Re: Suggestion for IETF Critical Infrastructrei WG. > todd glassey wrote: > > > Any commentary? > > For me it sounds like a proposal to reinvent the IAB as WG. > Some draft-iab-whatever and resulting RFCs like 4690 are > quite interesting, examples: > > draft-iab-auth-mech-05 > draft-iab-dns-choices-03 > draft-iab-dos-05 > draft-iab-messaging-report-01 > > That they tolerated the simultaneous SHOULD NOT vs. SHOULD > "experiments" with critical e-mail was a counter-example. > > Frank > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf