On 9/6/06, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Sayre <sayrer@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Robert> How do we test "universal interoperability"? MUSTs need to
Robert> be testable.
Musts do not need to be testable.
So the definition of "supports universal interoperability" is "I know
it when I see it"? Which IETF protocols are universally interoperable?
I think of SMTP and HTTP.
I also asked you two questions. Here is the second:
And why would we put the definition in Brian's document?
--
Robert Sayre
"I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf