Last call comment on 'XML Pipelining with Chunks for the

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This draft should be clarified slightly.

It has the idea of a "chunk" but does not adequately define it in relation
to existing standard concepts. Why is "chunk" necessary when we already
have "document" and "entity" defined?

More specifically, the draft does not explicitly state whether the chunk
must be well-formed: are chunks like SGML entitities that can be
concatenated to form the eventual document regardless of nesting?

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

Member, ISO JTC1 SC34 WG1
Former member, W3C XML IG, W3C XML Schema WG

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]