Re: Last call comment on 'XML Pipelining with Chunks for the

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rick Jelliffe wrote:
This draft should be clarified slightly.

It has the idea of a "chunk" but does not adequately define it in relation
to existing standard concepts. Why is "chunk" necessary when we already
have "document" and "entity" defined?

More specifically, the draft does not explicitly state whether the chunk
must be well-formed: are chunks like SGML entitities that can be
concatenated to form the eventual document regardless of nesting?

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

Rick,

Good questions. To answer them, a chunk is just a sequence of octets of the total data to be transfered, the size of which is up to the implementation. They do not have to be well-formed.

I'll add some clarifying text.

-andy


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]