Bernard Desruisseaux schrieb:
2) In
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-dusseault-caldav-14.html#rfc.section.5.2.1>
you refer to Section 12.4.1, which in RFC2518 describes the DAV:source
property. The equivalent of 12.4.1 in RFC2518bis does not exist in
RFC2518, so you can't refer to it (thus you may have to either repeat
it, or refer to RFC3253 or RFC3744 instead). Same for subsequent
references to that Section.
Actually, the draft is making reference to "Section 12.14.1 of [RFC2518]"
Right, sorry.
which describes the DAV:allprop XML element. Previously, the draft was
making reference to "Section 14.2 of [I-D.ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis]" which
also describes the DAV:allprop XML element. I believe we are fine here.
Yes, but the difference here is that RFC2518bis changed the meaning of
DAV:allprop from "all properties" to "all dead properties and the live
properties defined by RFC2518bis". Thus, if CalDAV doesn't want its live
properties to be returned, it can't say "DAV:allprop as defined by
RFC2518"...
Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf