Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bernard Desruisseaux schrieb:
2) In <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-dusseault-caldav-14.html#rfc.section.5.2.1> you refer to Section 12.4.1, which in RFC2518 describes the DAV:source property. The equivalent of 12.4.1 in RFC2518bis does not exist in RFC2518, so you can't refer to it (thus you may have to either repeat it, or refer to RFC3253 or RFC3744 instead). Same for subsequent references to that Section.

Actually, the draft is making reference to "Section 12.14.1 of [RFC2518]"

Right, sorry.

which describes the DAV:allprop XML element. Previously, the draft was
making reference to "Section 14.2 of [I-D.ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis]" which
also describes the DAV:allprop XML element. I believe we are fine here.

Yes, but the difference here is that RFC2518bis changed the meaning of DAV:allprop from "all properties" to "all dead properties and the live properties defined by RFC2518bis". Thus, if CalDAV doesn't want its live properties to be returned, it can't say "DAV:allprop as defined by RFC2518"...

Best regards, Julian

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]