Julian Reschke wrote:
With respect to draft 14, I notice that the reference to RFC2518bis has been downgraded to RFC2518 (which I don't object to), but that references *into* RFC2518 now use broken section numbers (as they haven't been updated accordingly).
Hi Julian, I'm sorry but all references into RFC2518 have been updated accordingly as far I can tell. Am I missing something? Cheers, Bernard _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf