IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• RE: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Stephen Hanna
• Re: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Douglas Otis
• RE: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Narayanan, Vidya
• RE: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Narayanan, Vidya
• Re: Response to appeal by Robert Sayre dated 2006-08-29
  • From: James M Snell
• Re: Response to appeal by Robert Sayre dated 2006-08-29
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Response to appeal by Robert Sayre dated 2006-08-29
  • From: Julian Reschke
• RE: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: Gray, Eric
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: Olaf M. Kolkman
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Frank Yeh Jr
• Re: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF - I want to see it...
  • From: Aisenberg, Michael
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: Sandy Wills
• call for documentation of legacy EAP methods
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Andy Bierman
• event calendar
  • From: Yaakov Stein
• Re: Please stop the country-specific references
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Please stop the country-specific references (Was: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF - I want to see it...
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Please stop the country-specific references (Was: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF - I want to see it...
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Please stop the country-specific references (Was: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF - I want to see it...
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Streaming Audio for IETF67 - Starts Monday November 6th.
  • From: Joel Jaeggli
• Away 10/12-10/16: [L2TPEXT Milestones past due]
  • From: Carlos Pignataro
• I'm not in the office
  • From: henk
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: Sandy Wills
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF - I want to see it...
  • From: Theodore Tso
• Re: Non-profit IETF (was RE: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF...)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Non-profit IETF (was RE: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF...)
  • From: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
• Re: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF - I want to see it...
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF - I want to see it...
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: David W. Hankins
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: David W. Hankins
• Re: Last Call: 'Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)' to Draft Standard (draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3730bis)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support
  • From: David W. Hankins
• Re: DNS pollution
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
• Re:[Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: yinhan 34728
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Frank Yeh Jr
• RE: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Frank Yeh Jr
• Re: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Alan DeKok
• Re: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF - I want to see it...
  • From: Theodore Tso
• Re: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF- ...
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF - I want to see it...
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: DNS pollution
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF - I want to see it...
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: DNS pollution
  • From: Olaf M. Kolkman
• Re: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF - I want to see it...
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF- ...
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: DNS pollution
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF- ...
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF- ...
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: DNS pollution
  • From: Stephen Casner
• Re: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF- ...
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF- I want to see it...
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF - I want to see it...
  • From: todd glassey
• RE: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF- ...
  • From: Scott Bradner
• RE: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF- I want to see it...
  • From: Fleischman, Eric
• RE: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Darryl (Dassa) Lynch
• Re: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF - I want to see it...
  • From: John C Klensin
• I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF - I want to see it...
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: DNS pollution
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: Complaints and complainers
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: DNS pollution
  • From: Edward Lewis
• RE: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Due process [Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)]
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: DNS pollution
  • From: Peter Koch
• Re: DNS pollution
  • From: Edward Lewis
• Re: Proceeding CDs
  • From: Tom.Petch
• Due process [Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: DNS pollution
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: DNS pollution
  • From: Stephen Casner
• Re: DNS pollution
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: DNS pollution
  • From: Mark Andrews
• RE: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Gray, Eric
• RE: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Darryl (Dassa) Lynch
• RE: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Darryl (Dassa) Lynch
• Re: DNS pollution
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Darryl (Dassa) Lynch
• Re: DNS pollution
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Eliot Lear
• RE: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Stephen Hanna
• Re: DNS pollution
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: DNS pollution
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• RE: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Narayanan, Vidya
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: todd glassey
• RE: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Narayanan, Vidya
• RE: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Ted Hardie
• DNS pollution
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Complaints and complainers
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Complaints and complainers (Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea))
  • From: Ned Freed
• RE: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Out of Office AutoReply:
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• The Delete button [Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Complaints and "rights" (was: Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea))
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Darryl (Dassa) Lynch
• Complaints and complainers (Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea))
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Theodore Tso
• RE: [Nea] Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Narayanan, Vidya
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• RE: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Fleischman, Eric
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Stephen Hanna
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: todd glassey
• OT : WAS: RE: IETF/US General Election
  • From: Moskovitz, Ram Austryjak
• COPYRIGHT NOTICE: WIPO issues (was: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea))
  • From: Kyse Faril
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Alper Yegin
• Re: WIPO issues (was: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea))
  • From: todd glassey
• RE: WIPO issues (was: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea))
  • From: Yaakov Stein
• Re: IETF/US General Election
  • From: Bill Strahm
• Re: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: todd glassey
• RE: IETF/US General Election
  • From: Moskovitz, Ram Austryjak
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Theodore Tso
• IETF/US General Election
  • From: Michael C. StJohns
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Theodore Tso
• RE: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Darryl (Dassa) Lynch
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Theodore Tso
• RE: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Narayanan, Vidya
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: David W. Hankins
• RE: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Narayanan, Vidya
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Fritz F. Saad
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Ted Hardie
• RE: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Susan Thomson (sethomso)
• RE: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Darryl (Dassa) Lynch
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• RE: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Narayanan, Vidya
• RE: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Narayanan, Vidya
• Re: Proceeding CDs
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: [secdir] [New-work] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Proceeding CDs
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: Proceeding CDs
  • From: David W. Hankins
• Re: Proceeding CDs
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: Proceeding CDs
  • From: bmanning
• RE: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Narayanan, Vidya
• Re: Proceeding CDs
  • From: Ted Faber
• RE: Proceeding CDs
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: Proceeding CDs
  • From: Michael C. StJohns
• RE: Proceeding CDs
  • From: Gray, Eric
• Re: Proceeding CDs
  • From: Michael C. StJohns
• Re: Proceeding CDs
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Re: Proceeding CDs
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Re: Proceeding CDs
  • From: shogunx
• Re: Proceeding CDs
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Douglas Otis
• IETF 68 & 69 Locations (lst)
  • From: IETF Administrative Director
• Proceeding CDs
  • From: IETF Administrative Director
• please unsubscribe me from this forum
  • From: upendra bhanja
• Re: IETF 68 & 69 Locations (a)
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Suggestion for IETF Critical Infrastructrei WG.
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Last Call: 'Key Change Strategies for TCP-MD5' to Informational RFC (draft-bellovin-keyroll2385)
  • From: Pekka Savola
• Re: Suggestion for IETF Critical Infrastructrei WG.
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• RE: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Susan Thomson (sethomso)
• Re: Last Call: 'Key Change Strategies for TCP-MD5' to Informational RFC (draft-bellovin-keyroll2385)
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Suggestion for IETF Critical Infrastructrei WG.
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Suggestion for IETF Critical Infrastructrei WG.
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Last Call: 'Key Change Strategies for TCP-MD5' to Informational RFC (draft-bellovin-keyroll2385)
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• IETF, ISOC and ISOC Chapters.
  • From: Franck Martin
• Re: Last Call: 'Key Change Strategies for TCP-MD5' to Informational RFC (draft-bellovin-keyroll2385)
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: todd glassey
• RE: [Nea] WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  • From: Narayanan, Vidya
• Re: Last Call: 'Key Change Strategies for TCP-MD5' to Informational RFC (draft-bellovin-keyroll2385)
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: 'Key Change Strategies for TCP-MD5' to Informational RFC (draft-bellovin-keyroll2385)
  • From: Pekka Savola
• Re: Last Call: 'Key Change Strategies for TCP-MD5' to Informational RFC (draft-bellovin-keyroll2385)
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: Last Call: 'Key Change Strategies for TCP-MD5' to Informational RFC (draft-bellovin-keyroll2385)
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: John C Klensin
• draft-carpenter-rfc2026-critique-02.txt (was: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis)
  • From: C. M. Heard
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Last Call: 'Key Change Strategies for TCP-MD5' to Informational RFC (draft-bellovin-keyroll2385)
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: MLTF meeting before IGF
  • From: Theodore Tso
• Re: Last Call: 'Key Change Strategies for TCP-MD5' to Informational RFC (draft-bellovin-keyroll2385)
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: MLTF meeting before IGF
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: 'Key Change Strategies for TCP-MD5' to Informational RFC (draft-bellovin-keyroll2385)
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: bmanning
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: 'Key Change Strategies for TCP-MD5' to Informational RFC (draft-bellovin-keyroll2385)
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: MLTF meeting before IGF
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: MLTF meeting before IGF
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• Re: MLTF meeting before IGF
  • From: Ted Hardie
• MLTF meeting before IGF
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• Re: Last Call: 'Key Change Strategies for TCP-MD5' to Informational RFC (draft-bellovin-keyroll2385)
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: Last Call: 'Key Change Strategies for TCP-MD5' to Informational RFC (draft-bellovin-keyroll2385)
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• Re: Last Call: 'Key Change Strategies for TCP-MD5' to InformationalRFC (draft-bellovin-keyroll2385)
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Last Call: 'Key Change Strategies for TCP-MD5' to Informational RFC (draft-bellovin-keyroll2385)
  • From: Fred Baker
• Out-of-Office AutoReply: New Version Notification -
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Theodore Tso
• Re: Last Call: 'Key Change Strategies for TCP-MD5' to Informational RFC (draft-bellovin-keyroll2385)
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Last Call: 'Key Change Strategies for TCP-MD5' to Informational RFC (draft-bellovin-keyroll2385)
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: Last Call: 'Key Change Strategies for TCP-MD5' to Informational RFC (draft-bellovin-keyroll2385)
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Bob Braden
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Eric Rosen
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: IETF-related spam from JFC Morfin
  • From: David Kessens
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: C. M. Heard
• Re: "zone" is not a DNS name semantic
  • From: David W. Hankins
• Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
  • From: Ralph Droms
• Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IETF-related spam from JFC Morfin
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: IETF-related spam from JFC Morfin
  • From: Theodore Tso
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: IETF-related spam from JFC Morfin
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: John C Klensin
• IETF-related spam from JFC Morfin
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
  • From: Matt Larson
• Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14
  • From: bmanning
• Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• "zone" is not a DNS name semantic
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
  • From: Matt Larson
• Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
  • From: David W. Hankins
• Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
  • From: Bill Fenner
• Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
  • From: John C Klensin
• As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
  • From: Stig Venaas
• Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
  • From: Stig Venaas
• Re: 25th Anniversary!
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• IDN effort has ballooned in scope without involving relevant additional review
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: 25th Anniversary!
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: Last Call: 'Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: 25th Anniversary!
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: 25th Anniversary!
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: 25th Anniversary!
  • From: stephen wolff
• RE: 25th Anniversary!
  • From: Bob Braden
• RE: 25th Anniversary!
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: 25th Anniversary!
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: 25th Anniversary!
  • From: Jeffrey I. Schiller
• Re: 25th Anniversary!
  • From: Bob Braden
• Re: 25th Anniversary!
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• RE: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 anddraft-newman-i18n-comparator-14
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• 25th Anniversary!
  • From: rpelletier
• Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Siemens to Host IETF 67
  • From: Fred Baker
• Siemens to Host IETF 67
  • From: rpelletier
• Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14
  • From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
• Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14
  • From: Lisa Dusseault
• Re: the pattern on this list (was: Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683))
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• the pattern on this list (was: Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683))
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Newtrk and ISDs
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Out-of-Office AutoReply: I-D was expired
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14
  • From: Arnt Gulbrandsen
• Comments on draft-dusseault-caldav-15 and draft-newman-i18n-comparator-14
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Looking forward not back
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: David Kessens
• Looking forward not back
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: RFC/Protocol Quantification
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• RFC/Protocol Quantification
  • From: Sreevathsa
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• RFC/Protocol Quantification
  • From: Sreevathsa
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Theodore Tso
• Re: Newtrk and ISDs (was: Re: Facts, please not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• Re: Newtrk and ISDs (was: Re: Facts, please not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Margaret Wasserman
• Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries
  • From: JFC Morfin
• Re: IANA XML registries
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• Newtrk and ISDs (was: Re: Facts, please not handwaving ...
  • From: Scott Bradner
• Newtrk and ISDs (was: Re: Facts, please not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IANA XML registries
  • From: Peter Dambier
• BCCed messages, was Re: IANA XML registries
  • From: Tony Finch
• IANA XML registries
  • From: JFC Morfin
• Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: The BOF wiki
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav)
  • From: Bernard Desruisseaux
• Re: [Ltru] IANA XML registries
  • From: JFC Morfin
• Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Scott Bradner
• Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please)
  • From: Russ Allbery
• Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please)
  • From: Dave Cridland
• RE: security features.... (Re: Facts, please)
  • From: Gray, Eric
• Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please)
  • From: Jeffrey Altman
• Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please)
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• RE: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: security features.... (Re: Facts, please)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Gray, Eric
• Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Facts, please, not handwaving
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• Re: security features.... (Re: Facts, please)
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav)
  • From: Julian Reschke
• security features.... (Re: Facts, please)
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Russ Allbery
• Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: grenville armitage
• Re: Facts, please, not handwaving
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• RE: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process
  • From: Theodore Tso
• Re: Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Bill Fenner
• Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: Flaw in the design of NoteWell makes Notewell Not Well.
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: Flaw in the design of NoteWell makes Notewell Not Well.
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Flaw in the design of NoteWell makes Notewell Not Well.
  • From: Bill Strahm
• Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an openElection Process
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Processratherthansome
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process
  • From: todd glassey
• Flaw in the design of NoteWell makes Notewell Not Well.
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome
  • From: todd glassey
• Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process
  • From: Nelson, David
• RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Specifying a state machine: ASCII-based languages
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome
  • From: Eliot Lear
• RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process
  • From: Yaakov Stein
• RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: Specifying a state machine: ASCII-based languages
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthansome
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather thansome
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some
  • From: bmanning
• Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some
  • From: bmanning
• Re: Specifying a state machine: ASCII-based languages
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Fw: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: Fw: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthan some
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Specifying a state machine: ASCII-based languages
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Fw: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Fw: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some
  • From: Tim Chown
• Fw: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Theodore Tso
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Eliot Lear
• RE: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• RE: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: John C Klensin
• help
  • From: Sheikh, Usman Fakhar (UMKC-Student)
• Re: Specifying a state machine: ASCII-based languages
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• RE: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Please make the madness stop (was: a whole bunch of flames)
  • From: Ted Faber
• Re: Please make the madness stop (was: a whole bunch of flames)
  • From: todd glassey
• RE: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• IPv6 communication
  • From: thekkayil.joy
• Please make the madness stop (was: a whole bunch of flames)
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?
  • From: Theodore Tso
• Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?
  • From: Carl Malamud
• Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Carl Malamud
• Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Constant flux (was: Why cant the IETF embrace an open ElectionProcess [...])
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?
  • From: todd glassey
• Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?
  • From: Pekka Savola
• Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some
  • From: todd glassey
• Constant flux (was: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process [...])
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some
  • From: Rob Evans
• Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: todd glassey
• Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Theodore Tso
• appeals
  • From: JFC Morfin
• Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: C. M. Heard
• RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Ned Freed
• RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Christian Huitema
• RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Kurt D. Zeilenga
• Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: RFC 2195
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Kurt D. Zeilenga
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Responses
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: bmanning
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: bmanning
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: bmanning
• Re: [mpls] Re: Last Call: 'Label Switching Router Self-Test' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-self-test) (2)
  • From: George Swallow
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Last Call: 'Label Switching Router Self-Test' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-self-test) (2)
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Responses
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Last Call: 'Label Switching Router Self-Test' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-self-test)
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt)
  • From: Pekka Savola
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Pekka Savola
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Ralph Droms
• RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• RFC Editor RFP Responses
  • From: rpelletier
• RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Eliot Lear
• RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• RFC 2195 (was Re: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• RE: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Pasi.Eronen
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Edward Lewis
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Decision to Reset the NomCom Process
  • From: Andrew Lange
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations'to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: C. M. Heard
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackofcommunicaiton here...
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: feed-license-08
  • From: James M Snell
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...
  • From: Theodore Tso
• feed-license-08 (was: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license))
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to belackofcommunicaiton here...
  • From: Al Arsenault
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• RE: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations'to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackofcommunicaiton here...
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...
  • From: Sandy Wills
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...
  • From: todd glassey
• RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip